Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 23:22 -0500, Jeff Raber wrote: > On 06/18/2010 01:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I want to keep to the 'Test Day' because the concurrency aspect - having > > everyone in IRC, including a developer to give a very fast feedback/fix > > loop - is one of the key features, and y

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread Jeff Raber
On 06/18/2010 01:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I want to keep to the 'Test Day' because the concurrency aspect - having > everyone in IRC, including a developer to give a very fast feedback/fix > loop - is one of the key features, and you can't maintain that over a > period longer than a day. > >

Re: Proposed directions for proven testers

2010-06-18 Thread Aaron Faanes
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 23:05 -0500, Aaron Faanes wrote: > >> I worked on this draft a bit on my own user-page. Specifically, I >> wikified some of the links and heavily edited the overview paragraph. >> I'm not an expert by any means on the

Re: Proposed directions for proven testers

2010-06-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 23:05 -0500, Aaron Faanes wrote: > I worked on this draft a bit on my own user-page. Specifically, I > wikified some of the links and heavily edited the overview paragraph. > I'm not an expert by any means on the proven-testers proposal, so I > might have introduced inaccurac

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Similar to my gut feeling.. > > Perhaps if we advertise it more and increase the test period from a day > to a week we might get a better test coverage since testers might not be > available exactly during the test day's time a

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:42 -0400, James Laska wrote: > I agree that simply having less of something doesn't make it better. > > Perhaps I should clarify my intent. By fewer, it was implied that the > extra time would be spent ensuring that each event was as successful as > it could be. My conc

Re: [Fedora QA] #77: Create new release criteria pages for Fedora 14

2010-06-18 Thread Fedora QA
#77: Create new release criteria pages for Fedora 14 -+-- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: jlaska Type: task| Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wik

[Fedora QA] #77: Create new release criteria pages for Fedora 14

2010-06-18 Thread Fedora QA
#77: Create new release criteria pages for Fedora 14 ---+ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: jlaska Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread James Laska
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 06/18/2010 03:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> QA gang, any thoughts here? > >> > > I'm not big on putting the Test Days into that schedule, I think the > > current system works fine from a scheduling POV. > > > > I don'

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread James Laska
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 08:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:39 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > Apologies for the delayed response. > > > > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:11 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > > I have created a detailed schedule for the QA team for Fedora 14 based >

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 06/18/2010 03:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> QA gang, any thoughts here? >> > I'm not big on putting the Test Days into that schedule, I think the > current system works fine from a scheduling POV. > > I don't think having fewer Test Days would improve attendance. I think > people just s

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:39 -0400, James Laska wrote: > Apologies for the delayed response. > > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:11 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > I have created a detailed schedule for the QA team for Fedora 14 based > > on the tasks from Fedora 13. The contents of this schedule will a

Re: Fedora 14 Schedule

2010-06-18 Thread James Laska
Apologies for the delayed response. On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:11 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > I have created a detailed schedule for the QA team for Fedora 14 based > on the tasks from Fedora 13. The contents of this schedule will also > drive the weekly schedule reminders this list gets about

rawhide report: 20100618 changes

2010-06-18 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jun 18 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 cpanspec-1.78-5.fc14.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2) dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i6

Re: [Fedora QA] #76: Use two methods to specify install source

2010-06-18 Thread Fedora QA
#76: Use two methods to specify install source --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

Re: [Fedora QA] #76: Use two methods to specify install source

2010-06-18 Thread Fedora QA
#76: Use two methods to specify install source --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki