Thanks. I use notepad++. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Dmitri Silaev
Sent: 26 March 2011 20:57
To: tesseract-ocr@googlegroups.com; BYTEFX
Subject: Re: tesseract api, how do you get the bbox co-ordinates in
commandline using the exe in win32
Well, wingrep is not a must have. I just mentione
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:42 AM, zdenko podobny wrote:
>> Can somebody explain why a tif size (2480x3508 @ 8BPP) is not processed?
The test image has 16 bpp.
> This is not tesseract but leptonica issue (library used for image handling).
> When I run it on linux I got error message comming from l
Great, I use it too, that's one of the famous free text editing
programs )) However it's not capable to do massive automated text file
processing, but I think this is what you need to achieve your goal...
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Adetokunbo Bamidele
wrote:
> Thanks. I use notepad++. :
When you have a small trained alphabet, Tesseract's classifier
sometimes might not find suitable matches and in that way it will
output a null character further converted to a space. However in your
case, there are Chinese characters that have many strokes and
outlines, many of which somehow (parti
Guys, I still can't understand what the error is produced by
Tesseract. Let's wait for the error screenshot. Or did you understand
everything already? Richard says he's got an error message...
Warm regards,
Dmitri Silaev
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:42 PM, zdenko podobny wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Ma
Well, wingrep is not a must have. I just mentioned it to name
anything. After all, it's shareware ))
You need a program that is just capable of processing text files and
doing some basic operations with words or numbers within a text line.
There's a vast of such programs on the Internet, you'll pr
Hi,
Glad you've made some progress with your goal.
As for parameters that can influence speed vs. accuracy - they are
many. Just to name a few:
classify_class_pruner_threshold
classify_class_pruner_multiplier
classify_cp_cutoff_strength
classify_integer_matcher_multiplier
These relate to the pr
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, zdenko podobny wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM, rpjday wrote:
> > long story short, i'm seeing this issue on my ubuntu 10.10 system:
> >
> >http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1599686
>
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, zdenko podobny wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM, rpjday wrote:
> long story short, i'm seeing this issue on my ubuntu 10.10 system:
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1599686
>
> the packages i have installed:
>
> * tessearct-ocr
>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM, rpjday wrote:
> long story short, i'm seeing this issue on my ubuntu 10.10 system:
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1599686
>
> the packages i have installed:
>
> * tessearct-ocr
> * tesseract-ocr-eng
>
> which version you installed?
> i took a si
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Lutz, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just ran your tif file, I get no results, it must have something to do
> with the size of the image. If I try to run a portion of tiff something
> smaller than 1000x1000 then I get results.
>
> Can somebody explain why a tif size
convert it to png - you got smaller picture with the same quality and
tesseract should process it without problem.
Zdenko
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Richard Genthner wrote:
> Here is the screenshot and the tif file. Dmitri if you rename the .exe that
> should work. I'm trying to get the tr
long story short, i'm seeing this issue on my ubuntu 10.10 system:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1599686
the packages i have installed:
* tessearct-ocr
* tesseract-ocr-eng
i took a simple screenshot of some text, saved it to a .tif file, then
ran:
$ tesseract tess.tif tess
According irfanview, is compressed as - LZW tif file of 300 DPI What Quan
says is correct image is heavily compressed tif one. Tesseract-OCR is
supported only *uncompressed tif* file only from my experience.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Quan Nguyen wrote:
> The image appears to have been
The image appears to have been heavily compressed. OCR the whole image
did not yield anything. Doing it blockwise, I got some results but not
very accurate:
Ch Juhe 24, 2@@9 the ACHP vctect ct: revisect teccmmehdettcns tcr
mee_s1es-muhqes-t'ube[[e (NR/H~
‘evictetnce ct tmmuhity’ requtrementstcr he
15 matches
Mail list logo
