Re: Tess4J - a Java wrapper for Tesseract OCR DLL

2010-08-23 Thread Quan Nguyen
Oh, thanks, James. I'd be happy to use the code to build the .so and avoid duplicate effort. I'll get in touch with you if more info is needed. Thank you, again. Quan On Aug 23, 2:44 am, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:35:26 -0700 (PDT) > > Quan Nguyen wrote: > > A JNA-based wra

Re: Which revision of tesseract 3.0 for win7 64bit

2010-08-23 Thread Quan Nguyen
I am able to confirm Tesseract r454 with new Leptonica-1.66 binary ran w/o the problem that was reported in Issue 304. Well, with one little other problem, though: Could not open file, ./tessdata/eng.user-words I had to create an empty file with the name to get it to run. When I tried with -l vie

Re: Tess4J - a Java wrapper for Tesseract OCR DLL

2010-08-23 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Quan Nguyen wrote: > A JNA-based wrapper for Tesseract OCR DLL, the library provides > optical character recognition (OCR) support for: > > * TIFF, JPEG, GIF, PNG, and BMP image formats > * Multi-page TIFF images > * PDF document format > > h

Re: Which revision of tesseract 3.0 for win7 64bit

2010-08-23 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 23 August 2010 12:19, zdenko podobny wrote: > > There is new version (1.66) of leptonica [1] including precompiled windows > libraries. I copied > lib/*.lib from leptonica-1.66-win32-lib-include-dirs.zip to tesseract\lib >  and lib/*.dll to tesseract\ directory.. > Than I was able to build Debu

Re: Which revision of tesseract 3.0 for win7 64bit

2010-08-23 Thread zdenko podobny
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:19 PM, zdenko podobny wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Max wrote: > >> >> On Aug 19, 11:49 am, "Jimmy O'Regan" wrote: >> > On 19 August 2010 11:23, Joe Degenhardt >> wrote: >> > >> > No, that's the state of things. >> > >> >> hmm... The latest code compiles

Re: Which revision of tesseract 3.0 for win7 64bit

2010-08-23 Thread zdenko podobny
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Max wrote: > > On Aug 19, 11:49 am, "Jimmy O'Regan" wrote: > > On 19 August 2010 11:23, Joe Degenhardt > wrote: > > > > No, that's the state of things. > > > > hmm... The latest code compiles and works for me :). May be I should > have mentioned that only the