Eric Richard Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Usually root has a really limited $PATH environment variable (the $PATH
> environment variable lists the directories that the shell will look in
> to find the commands and files you specify on the command line).
Mine is really limited yes. In the
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:16:45AM -0800 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On the whole this little adventure was a good thing.
> which is aliased in my .bashrc, and if it is, I'll fix the alias so it
> searches a more reasonable path for what it is supposed to do. If it
> isn't, I'll c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Mine is really limited yes. In the morning with my brain working again,
> I found ldconfig (in /sbin). Interestingly, I found out that which has
> somehow been configured so that it doesn't check every directory on my
> box... just the ones in my path. That is what mostly got
Emily-
Just adding my 2 cents to the below...the 6.0 version of RedHat came with an
install of XWindows that usually failed to run because a file in the X11
folder permissions were set wrong, though it wasn't made clear what the
permissions on the file SHOULD be. There were also occasional error
Okay, this may not be the best place for this question, but i thought I'd
ask. I'm wanting to play around with Cisco IOS, but don't have access to a
router and no money to buy one. Is there any product that might allow me to
emulate IOS on a PC (that won't cost me as much as buying a router?)
~~
Check out www.ciscorouted.com
You can sign up for free and use their routers. It's a great sandbox to play
in.
--Heather
- Original Message -
From: "Nicoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:52 AM
Subject: [techtalk] Cisco IOS
> Okay,
Most of what I found on the net so far has been vague,
I assume I am looking in the wrong place. How easy is
it to use a Linux machine as a file server for a Mac
network? We have a customer whose server is an NT machine,
and has been serving Mac Files successfully to the Mac
design network, but
I'm using Debian 2.2 (potato) for my school's webserver right
now.
Would there be any benefits in changing the OS to OpenBSD 2.7
(Besides security, of course)?
- Kath
Amy:
There are a couple of ways you can do this. The quickest way would probably
be to use a package such as NetATalk -- more info on it is available at
http://www.umich.edu/~rsug/netatalk/ and there is a Linux Netatalk HOWTO at
http://thehamptons.com/anders/netatalk/ . This should meet your ne
Security, and most people consider BSD faster at serving if your site is
VERY loaded. But mainly security.
Jason
-Original Message-From: Kath
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000
4:35 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [techtalk]
OpenBSD vs. Debian 2.
Yes. The warm fuzzy feeling of knowing you are running a superior
operating system. ;-)
Kath wrote:
> I'm using Debian 2.2 (potato) for my school's webserver right
> now. Would there be any benefits in changing the OS to OpenBSD 2.7
> (Besides security, of course)? - Kath
The biggest drawback of OpenBSD in my opinion is (as stated in section 1.2
of the OpenBSD FAQ):
"Yes, OpenBSD will run on your multiprocessor machine, but it will only
use one processor. There currently is no support for SMP".
If you aren't using a multiprocessor machine, then OpenBSD is probabl
To expand a bit on this.. openbsd has a MUCH smaller driver base.. before
jumping openbsd make sure your network cards and scsi cards are supported
(if any).
Jumping from Debian to OpenBSD requires a little learning curve since
devices/default shells and lots of commands behave diffrently and use
curious wrote:
> Jumping from Debian to OpenBSD requires a little learning curve since
> devices/default shells and lots of commands behave diffrently and use
> diffrent switches...
Do you happen to know of a resource along the lines of "BSD for
Linux Users"?
I'd class myself as an experienced u
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:01:57 +0100
Magni Onsoien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also thought ldconfig was run automagically at boot - it says so on its
> webpage - but it didn't when I just tested. However, I just tried to add
> /usr/lib in ld.so.conf, and ldconfig might just ignore that and thus
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
