I know there was a bug in the installer of 6.0 that wouldn't install if you
attempted to leave one of your partitions as unformatted FAT (I experienced
it myself, and it took HOURS to troubleshoot). I don't know if it's still a
problem in 6.2, but I think I remember someone mentioning it...
If y
Subba Rao, [EMAIL PROTECTED], said:
> I am pretty new to GNOME. My .xinitrc has gnome-session at the end.
> What I am looking for is virtual desktops (like I had in
> FVWM2). I would like that available on the desktop or in the panel(if
> that's what it is called) on the bottom.
>
> Where can I
Hi,
>
> What we advise people is to "go with what you know". If you don't know
> anything, we suggest you pick one and stick to it. It helps if you pick
> something that folks around you are using as it will be easier to find
> help.
Sometimes I agree with this, but sometimes I don't. I starte
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Rachel Andrew wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've tried to do this before unsuccessfully but I thought I'd have another
> go at it.
>
> At the moment my network at home consists of two pooters. A doze box called
> George and a Linux box called Dot. ATM i am connecting to the net
> thr
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 10:46:22AM -0400 or thereabouts, Fan, Laurel wrote:
> Subba Rao, [EMAIL PROTECTED], said:
> > I am pretty new to GNOME. My .xinitrc has gnome-session at the end.
> > What I am looking for is virtual desktops (like I had in
> > FVWM2). I would like that available on the des
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Caitlyn M. Martin wrote:
>
> Sometimes I agree with this, but sometimes I don't. I started with Free
> BSD, but moved to Linux simply because more apps seemed to be available at
> the time and more people were migrating to Linux than to BSD. I'm
> comfortable in either
Hello list,
Puh-lease, somebody out there, take a moment to answer this if you
can.
I'm running wu-ftpd on a RedHat Linux system and have a directory that
requires a username & password to access. The account is set up with the
proper permissions (e.g. home directory is set to the directo
>It is not possible to use AOL's proprietary service with Unix and Linux.
This is not true. GNU/Linux users are free to use their machines
to access any proprietary systems they wish to. THere is no prohibition in
the GPL against using proprietary services - just against linking free wi
You misunderstood me, I said nothing about the gpl and was not referring
to that. I was saying that AOL makes it's proprietary systems inaccessable
to anyone who is not running their software, which is not available for
Unix as far as I know.
I'm aware that the gpl allows you to run proprietary
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:54:27 -0500 (CDT), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>It is not possible to use AOL's proprietary service with Unix and
>>Linux.
>This is not true. GNU/Linux users are free to use their
>machines to access any proprietary systems they wish to. THere is no
>prohibition i
Alright, here's the deal, I had my Linux machine (Mandrake 7) running
just fine. I'm using fetchmail to retrieve my email messages from my pop3
ISP server.
The fetchmail file is perfect, I've been using it for a month. Then I
installed a new hard drive. That worked, but left things a littl
Quite odd that it wouldn't work after a fresh install. Can you give me the
output you get when you run fetchmail in verbose mode (fetchmail -v)?
Robert Wade
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Anthony Russello wrote:
>
> Alright, here's the deal, I had my Linux machine (Mandrake 7) running
> just fine. I'
12 matches
Mail list logo
