[techtalk] Re: ipchains

2000-03-19 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 18-Mar-100 Re: ipchains by [EMAIL PROTECTED] > However, it will only tell you the ports, some information about the > sequence numbers and guess the OS if you tell it to. It won't actually > print out any vulnerabilities or try to break through the firewall. I've found

[subb3@attglobal.net: kernel log]

2000-03-19 Thread Subba Rao
I have the following entry in my syslog to trap the kern messages: kern.* /var/log/kernel-log Each time my system dials to my ISP, it creates a log file on /. home/ kernel-log.10.36.6.186 kernel-log.10.37.51.48 kernel-log.10.34.20

Moderator stuff

2000-03-19 Thread jenn
Would whomever is subscribed as an egroups.com mailing list please, PLEASE make the egroups.com list unmoderated? It's very bad form (and VERY confusing) for everyone who mails linuxchix.org to get a 'your message is awaiting moderation' message from an egroups.com address. Thank you. Jenn

Re: ipchains

2000-03-19 Thread moebius
Hey Shelly, <---Reply below> > my question is - what is the best way to test that the firewall is secure? i > configured mine using ipchains (also doing masquerading for my internal lan, > which is set up as a 192.168.x.x network - my external interface is an isdn > connection at work). i h

Re: [techtalk] Re: ipchains

2000-03-19 Thread Jeff
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 04:42:46AM -0500, Laurel Fan wrote: > Excerpts from linuxchix: 18-Mar-100 Re: ipchains by [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > However, it will only tell you the ports, some information about the > > sequence numbers and guess the OS if you tell it to. It won't actually > > print out an

Re: ipchains

2000-03-19 Thread Ian Hall-Beyer
hackerwhacker will give you a detailed ascan without forking over cash. You just have to do the basic scan, first. -Ian -- wow, this is kinda nifty. the win98 protocol stack is like a chinese finger puzzle, twist and turn in the right places, and it pops right off --Seen

Re: Moderator stuff

2000-03-19 Thread Steve Howes
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would whomever is subscribed as an egroups.com mailing list please, PLEASE make the egroups.com list unmoderated? It's very bad form (and VERY confusing) for everyone who mails linuxchix.org  to get a 'your message is awaiting moderation' message from an egroups.com add

[techtalk] Re: Moderator stuff

2000-03-19 Thread Gregory Conron
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Steve Howes wrote: > > >   > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Would whomever is subscribed as an egroups.com mailing > list please, PLEASE > make the egroups.com list unmoderated? > It's very bad form (and VERY confusing) for everyone who mails > linuxchix.org  to get a 'your mess

Re: [techtalk] Re: Moderator stuff

2000-03-19 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 19-Mar-100 [techtalk] Re: Moderator stuffGregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1504*) by [entire quoted message snipped] > Speaking of bad form - html on a mailing list (esp. a linux > mailing list)? Very bad form - no bonus points for you. Speaking of speaking of bad form, we didn