Yellow on black is a big win for me. After 15 years I still prefer
it.
.Tami
.signature: syntax error at line 1: `(' unexpected
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Hello All;
I'm trying to install some new apps under Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 using KDE's
COAS and keep getting dependency errors.
Here's a sample of the error message I get...
need libc.so.6(GLIB_2.0)
I think this is referring to some C libraries?
Where can I find these for download?
Any help woul
Hi, newbie delurking. :) And I have a sort of general question for
an issue I'm struggling with right now.
I'm a programmer, my husband is a sysadmin; we're 22. I've recently
realized that most of the pressure I'm feeling is due to the expectation
that the woman takes care of the bills and clean
#if [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello All;
>
> I'm trying to install some new apps under Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 using KDE's
> COAS and keep getting dependency errors.
> Here's a sample of the error message I get...
> need libc.so.6(GLIB_2.0)
> I think this is referring to some C libraries?
> Where can I
#if Jenny Brown (was Gable)
[...]
> Now... we've considered getting a cleaning service to come take care of
> basic housework; and another service (whose name I can't spell) to take
> care of letting service people in to work on appliances and such.
>
> But I feel oddly uncomfortable with that so
I'm thinking I'd like to convert my mail server
and laptop from SuSE to Mandrake. Mandrake has better/easier to use
configuration (chkconfig) and security settings/options. It's also
compiled for 586's and above, yielding speed improvements.
So the big question is how do I do it. I have partit
Hi,
Thanks a lot for all the responses.. Getting all this help is really
cool. Here are some answers to your questions.
--Um.. Why are you using 'uart 16450' ? IIRC that's for old, slow
--serial ports and new machines should have 16550.
I have a program called 'CheckIt' and it tells me that
I was once in a relationship a tiny bit similar to yours.
My ex-boyfriend was a SysAdmin and I was a programmer up until I broke
up with him 2 months ago (which happened because of reasons totally
unrelated to this topic). We lived one hour apart but whenever he'd
come and stay a few days, I wo
Hey Linda,
Just an opinion not really an answer. Why go with Mandrake? Yeah the
kernel is optimized for Pentium and greater, this is something you could
do for yourself. It's not to hard and if you have the docs in front of you
it makes it a little easier.
Mandrake, again just my opinion, is t
Hey Tania,
> I have a program called 'CheckIt' and it tells me that the modem's UART
> is 16540. That's the only reason I used that number. My modem's
> specifications don't refer to a UART at all.
If it's a pci modem I have some trouble believing that 'CheckIt' is
telling the truth. I don't know
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 08:28:31PM -0500, Tania M. Morell wrote:
> Hi,
Hello.. this is my first post to the list, but I'll get my introduction done later ;)
>
> Thanks a lot for all the responses.. Getting all this help is really
> cool. Here are some answers to your questions.
<>
>
> --cu
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Linda Walsh wrote:
> /etc. But then, to make it worse, they have a README about their startup
> philosophy that talked about 'init' being the *father* of all processes.
I can't say anything about the relative strengths of SuSE v Madrake, but
as far as the sexism of the nam
#if Tania M. Morell
> used to that in no time at all. As it is, I wish I could afford that
> now for myself. I'm a Unix SysAdmin now, and with all the learning and
> work I have ahead of me, I hate wasting my little time on laundry,
> cooking, and cleaning. It's a pain.
All this learning ahead
#if Linda Walsh
> I'm thinking I'd like to convert my mail server
> and laptop from SuSE to Mandrake. Mandrake has better/easier to use
> configuration (chkconfig) and security settings/options. It's also
> compiled for 586's and above, yielding speed improvements.
>
> So the big question is ho
#if Tania M. Morell
> I have a program called 'CheckIt' and it tells me that the modem's UART
> is 16540. That's the only reason I used that number. My modem's
> specifications don't refer to a UART at all.
Right. It doesn't use your machine's UART things because it is
internal, not connected to
I would have to second that assesment.
Shad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hey Linda,
> Just an opinion not really an answer. Why go with Mandrake? Yeah the
> kernel is optimized for Pentium and greater, this is something you could
> do for yourself. It's not to hard and if you have the docs in
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 05:23:49PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I'm thinking I'd like to convert my mail server
> and laptop from SuSE to Mandrake. Mandrake has better/easier to use
> configuration (chkconfig) and security settings/options. It's also
> compiled for 586's and above, yielding speed
I've recently dealt with a similar issue...
I'm the sole parent of two children (ages 8 and 9). I was trying to work full time,
take care of two kids, keep up with two pets, clean, do laundry, pay bills, study for
these certifications (cisco) that my employer wants me to get, a long list of ot
Linda:
I think some of the negative comments about Mandrake are a bit
harsh, but since I'm not a technical expert I could be wrong.
Also, I can't tell you anything about Mandrake as a server since
I'm using it as a desktop system. However, I can comment on a
few things.
I don't think you'll find
#if Tania M. Morell
> used to that in no time at all. As it is, I wish I could afford that
> now for myself. I'm a Unix SysAdmin now, and with all the learning and
> work I have ahead of me, I hate wasting my little time on laundry,
> cooking, and cleaning. It's a pain.
Select no-ironing clot
> I haven't heard of one. The LSB has one in the works, but nothing yet. Besides,
>SuSE is a member of the LSB.
>
> As far as I can tell, SuSE doesn't have any file system quirks (I compile a lot of
>software myself, and I have yet to have a package that complains about anything. All
>the
21 matches
Mail list logo
