On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Rino Mardo wrote:
> So what do we standardized on text-only formats?
> We have yet to hear the silent majority.
I do use pine, too, so html emails are a nuisance. I also think that we
could just follow netiquette (on this subject, but on quoting and subjects
- sigh - too) wi
I rest my case. Deb has spoken and I think we should follow.
Thanks Deb.
On Sun, 28 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do use pine, too, so html emails are a nuisance. I also think that we
> could just follow netiquette (on this subject, but on quoting and subjects
> - sigh - too) without v
Rino Mardo wrote:
> Agree.
>
> So what do we standardized on text-only formats?
> We have yet to hear the silent majority.
>
> On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Kathleen Weaver wrote:
>
> > >People what do you say? Shall we be more text-/console-friendly and
> > >standardized on text only emails.
> >
> > S
Replies to grrltalk, not to techtalk, please.
Steve Kudlak wrote:
> What I dislike most about netequitte is that new rules which it is way too easy to
>trip over, seem to me get made up everyday.
> So it is hard to run afoul of some new rule. Worse yet when one feels that the rule
>is a silly
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Lighthouse Keeper in the Desert Sun wrote:
> Isn't there also netiquette about keeping attributions? Even if your
> personal viewer doesn't insert them, it isn't that hard to look at the
> from: line and type something like "Jane Geek wrote..." or use a mailer
> that *does
On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
> "Jenn V." wrote:
>
> > Replies to grrltalk, not to techtalk, please.
>
> OH PLEASER NO MORE LECTURES!!!
> I AM NOT IN JUNIOR HIGH FOR HEAVEN SAKES!!!
> WISE STUPID TRADITION SPOREADING LIKE A CANCER!!!
I'm hoping this was a tongue-in-cheek retort, other
> ** Original Subject: Re: [techtalk] No HTML/RTF messages, please!
> ** Original Sender: "J B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ** Original Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:21:15 GMT
> ** Original Message follows...
>
> I have noticed that ocasionally Homail will insert a small HTML tab in the
> messages.
On One Day In Novemember 'Lots of People' Wrote:
> vi, ...>
>
Well, I vote to keep html and rtf in the lists simply for the
entertainment value of the discussion threads it produces. And those
who really dont like html / rtf can add a filter i spose. (it really is
trivial to convert incoming h
Gregory Conron wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Steve Kudlak wrote:
> > "Jenn V." wrote:
> >
> > > Replies to grrltalk, not to techtalk, please.
> >
> > OH PLEASER NO MORE LECTURES!!!
> > I AM NOT IN JUNIOR HIGH FOR HEAVEN SAKES!!!
> > WISE STUPID TRADITION SPOREADING LIKE A CANCER!!!
>
> I'm hopi
> Agree.
>
> So what do we standardized on text-only formats?
> We have yet to hear the silent majority.
agree, me too. i'm using elm, which certainly doesn't like html.
sara
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Most of the irc servers try to resolve the client identd. Some
of them do not even allow a connection. How can I fix this problem?
Where is identd invoked from? Are there any security issues with it?
Thank you in advance.
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
"Jenn V." wrote:
> Replies to grrltalk, not to techtalk, please.
>
> Steve Kudlak wrote:
>
> > What I dislike most about netequitte is that new rules which it is way too easy to
>trip over, seem to me get made up everyday.
> > So it is hard to run afoul of some new rule. Worse yet when one fee
identd is usally started via inetd.
your distro probably has a package for it.
If not, it is a minor issue to download and install.
If you are using IP masquerading you will need to use a modified identd
server specifically for use in such a situation. This identd server
will need to be on the m
On 28 Nov 1999 18:25:51 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Most of the irc servers try to resolve the client identd. Some
>of them do not even allow a connection. How can I fix this problem?
>Where is identd invoked from? Are there any security issues with it?
identd is run from inetd.
Actually,
14 matches
Mail list logo
