Re: [techtalk] PS2 Mouse and RH6.1 - almost solved

1999-10-16 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Michelle Leonard wrote: > Thanks Kir! You are welcome! > Mouse was misbehaving in both console and X > > The ps command returns > gpm -t imps > which is not right, since I switched to a generic ps2 > mouse. So after reviewing gpm manpage, ran > killall gpm > gpm -t ps2

Re: [techtalk] Fw: [grrltalk] question about remote root access

1999-10-16 Thread Wendt,Andrew
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, you wrote: >> I got a question and since I've dug around all morning with no answer, I >> figured I'd ask you folks. :-) >> >> I guess I've figured out that by default, Redhat (and SGI 1.1), will not >let >> you log in as root by telnetting into the system. How do you turn t

[techtalk] To me it fast becomes a non-technical issue...(COREL/GIMP/PHOTOSHOP etc.)

1999-10-16 Thread Steve Kudlak
After talking a number of people on line, this always seems like the "vi vs. EMACS" debate. In that besides it sounds an awful lot like me saying to a vi enthusiast "But vi DOESN'T EVEN TRY TO DO WHAT EMACS can..." it would fast become just some weird argument in the technical sense. Like that "te

Re: [techtalk] Is there a Kill -8, too?

1999-10-16 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Jenn wrote: > killall might work > > i.e killall netscape 'killall' is just a program to let you kill processes specified by their name (rather than their PID). If you 'killall netscape' it does grep for netscape's PID and kills it like kill(1), i.e. you can specify signa

Re: [techtalk] Fw: [grrltalk] question about remote root access

1999-10-16 Thread Steve Kudlak
At 04:14 AM 10/16/99 -0400, Wendt,Andrew wrote: >On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, you wrote: > >>> I got a question and since I've dug around all morning with no answer, I >>> figured I'd ask you folks. :-) >>> >>> I guess I've figured out that by default, Redhat (and SGI 1.1), will not >>let >>> you log in a

Re: [techtalk] Fw: [grrltalk] question about remote root access

1999-10-16 Thread Steve Kudlak
At 04:14 AM 10/16/99 -0400, Wendt,Andrew wrote: >On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, you wrote: > >>> I got a question and since I've dug around all morning with no answer, I >>> figured I'd ask you folks. :-) >>> >>> I guess I've figured out that by default, Redhat (and SGI 1.1), will not >>let >>> you log in a

Re: [techtalk] To me it fast becomes a non-technicalissue...(COREL/GIMP/PHOTOSHOP etc.)

1999-10-16 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Steve Kudlak wrote: > After talking a number of people on line, this always seems like the "vi > vs. EMACS" debate. In that besides it sounds an awful lot like me saying to > a vi enthusiast "But vi DOESN'T EVEN TRY TO DO WHAT EMACS can..." it would > fast become just some weird argument in the t

Re: [techtalk] Secure web server...What's Your Favorite color??

1999-10-16 Thread Beverly Guillermo
At 02:31 AM 10/16/99 -0400, you wrote: >Has Anyone Read the RED BOOK (not the mag:) the DOD's read NSAs security >manual, and does it have useful material better that the standard Network >Security References? If you don't mind knowing all the intricate details of what is supposed to be implement

Re: [techtalk] To me it fast becomes a non-technicalissue...(COREL/GIMP/PHOTOSHOP etc.)

1999-10-16 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:05:54 +, Kir Kolyshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Well, there is one VERY important issue - do you need BITMAPPED >graphics or VECTORED one. GIMP, Corel PhotoPaint, Adobe Photoshop are >all doing bitmapped graphics well for us (although my personal >favorite is The GIMP

Re: [techtalk] To me it fast becomes a non-technicalissue...(COREL/GIMP/PHOTOSHOP etc.)

1999-10-16 Thread Caitlyn M. Martin
> but Corel > Draw! is a vector graphics program, and you can't obtain such functionality > from bitmapped graphics. For example, if you need a logo, it is much better to > draw it as vectors, because later you can scale it as you like without any > quality loss. You can't do that kind of things w

Re: [techtalk] Secure web server...What's Your Favorite color??

1999-10-16 Thread Stephan Zaniolo
Where can I find this RED BOOK? Thanks, Stephan At 07:54 AM 10/16/99 -0400, you wrote: >At 02:31 AM 10/16/99 -0400, you wrote: >>Has Anyone Read the RED BOOK (not the mag:) the DOD's read NSAs security >>manual, and does it have useful material better that the standard Network >>Security

Re: [techtalk] Secure web server...What's Your Favorite color??

1999-10-16 Thread Beverly Guillermo
Goto: http://astalavista.box.sk and do a search for "red book". Beverly - Original Message - From: Stephan Zaniolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 1999 10:26 AM Subject: Re: [techtalk] Secure web server...What's Your Favorite color?? > Where can

Re: [techtalk] For the not so techie Linux users

1999-10-16 Thread narmstr
On 15 Oct 99, at 10:30, kev wrote: > Well I am one happy chicken at the moment! :-) > I changed my modem to IRQ 5 last night (with setserial), and got an > internet connection without any problem. Bye bye Windows! I can't wait to > format the Windows half of my hard drive :-) > Many thanks to eve

[techtalk] Linux PPTP client + NT Server

1999-10-16 Thread Kristina
Hi, all! ~sigh~ So, I've read everything I can find in mailing list archives, HOWTO's, etc on the Linux PPTP client and connecting to an NT PPTP server. However, no matter what I do, I still get the dreaded "LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests" from pppd when trying to connect. The kernel (2

Re: [techtalk] pine 4.2

1999-10-16 Thread Ian Hall-Beyer
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Nicole wrote: > > Could be. they keep changing it, who can keep track?? > > I noticed... for pine4.10, the pine-ports said build slx. Maybe I was just > going off of the website (linked somewhere from www.washington.edu/pine), > but either way I built using slx... and this v

[techtalk] localhost, etc.

1999-10-16 Thread Nadine
This is a question I don't really even know how to start asking. I'm running DeadRat 6.0 [;-)] on a home PC that isn't connected to any networks (for the time being). What exactly does the /etc/hosts file do? A little context: I know close to nil about networking, and every time I've tried to u

Re: [techtalk] localhost, etc.

1999-10-16 Thread Wendt,Andrew
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, you wrote: >This is a question I don't really even know how to start asking. > >I'm running DeadRat 6.0 [;-)] on a home PC that isn't connected to any >networks (for the time being). > >What exactly does the /etc/hosts file do? The /etc/hosts file is consulted when you attemp

Re: [techtalk] To me it fast becomes a non-technical issue...(COREL/GIMP/PHOTOSHOP etc.)

1999-10-16 Thread Ingrid Schupbach
> I don't know if I want to inflict a technical group where people are > looking for CODE and sources, and stuff, with a long discussion about this. > ALTHOUGH if someone has built a DUAL-BOOT LINUX and still uses MICROSOFT > for OCCASSIONAL THINGS, like running a "Tested, Trusted Tool ONE DOESN'T

Re: [techtalk] localhost, etc.

1999-10-16 Thread Jeff Dike
> Here's my /etc/hosts file: > 127.0.0.1 nzingha nzingha.org You really need to add localhost to that line. Lots of things "know" that localhost refers to the local machine. That will get you past the connect problem. To add some background to this, /etc/hosts is usually the first pla

Re: [techtalk] localhost, etc.

1999-10-16 Thread Wendt,Andrew
>This process is all controlled by /etc/host.conf. Mine has this in it (which >is standard): > >order hosts,bind > >which says "check the /etc/hosts file, then the real nameservers if that >doesn't work. I wonder how /etc/host.conf differs from /etc/nsswitch.conf. I have both files, and they b

Re: [techtalk] localhost, etc.

1999-10-16 Thread Jeff Dike
> I wonder how /etc/host.conf differs from /etc/nsswitch.conf. I have > both files, and they both seem to set the search order... You're right. I've got no idea what host.conf is for. nsswitch.conf is definitely the one being used: % strace ping mv.mv.com ... open("/etc/nsswitch.conf", O_RDON

RE: [techtalk] localhost, etc.

1999-10-16 Thread Samantha Jo Moore
OK, quick tutorial on /etc/hosts and localhost... /etc/hosts Now a days, connectivity is a big issue. Computers aren't worth a dime if they can't connect to one another. Connectivity protocols are varied but the most reliable, and the one the internet is based on is TCP/IP (Transfer Control P