On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Deb Richardson wrote:
>It appears that someone has subscribed techtalk to a moderated list at
>egroups.com.
I thought that someone had subscribed the moderated egroups list to
techtalk. As evidence, so far only people who have posted to one of the
linxchix lists (techtalk I
It appears that someone has subscribed techtalk to a moderated list at
egroups.com. It also appears to be a private list, because I cannot
find any information about it at egroups.com. I've tried emailing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] owner, but have received no response.
I will do everything in my pow
Gregory Conron wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Steve Howes wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Would whomever is subscribed as an egroups.com mailing
> > list please, PLEASE
> > make the egroups.com list unmoderated?
> > It's very bad form (and VERY confusing) for everyone who
Excerpts from linuxchix: 19-Mar-100 [techtalk] Re: Moderator
stuffGregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1504*) by
[entire quoted message snipped]
> Speaking of bad form - html on a mailing list (esp. a linux
> mailing list)? Very bad form - no bonus points for you.
Speaking of speaking of bad fo
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Steve Howes wrote:
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would whomever is subscribed as an egroups.com mailing
> list please, PLEASE
> make the egroups.com list unmoderated?
> It's very bad form (and VERY confusing) for everyone who mails
> linuxchix.org to get a 'your mess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would whomever is subscribed as an egroups.com mailing
list please, PLEASE
make the egroups.com list unmoderated?
It's very bad form (and VERY confusing) for everyone who mails
linuxchix.org to get a 'your message is awaiting moderation'
message
from an egroups.com add
Would whomever is subscribed as an egroups.com mailing list please, PLEASE
make the egroups.com list unmoderated?
It's very bad form (and VERY confusing) for everyone who mails
linuxchix.org to get a 'your message is awaiting moderation' message
from an egroups.com address.
Thank you.
Jenn
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 09:54:32AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW: The response I sent to you about the Xserver question was intended as
> a list response. I KNEW the list was still messed up, and I STILL forgot
> to check the 'to'. Grump.
Very annoying, besides I was looking forward to
dez wrote:
> >>Your posting (Subject: "multiple xservers") has been sent to the
> moderator ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") for approval. When the
> moderator approves the posting, it will be automatically distributed
> to the group.>>
This is _really really
it seems all my posts are going through the moderator...every one i send i
get a message back telling me it is going to the lists moderator for
approval and then posted on...
the turnaround is quite a considerable ammount of time.
I never got any info when i joined the list ( as usually you do on
dez wrote:
>
> do all posts have to go through a moderator...
> i posted a request for information on xservers and got this reply...(this is
> why i am asking..i am new).
The lists went down due to some sort of fault. Deb is struggling to get
them back up and correctly con
do all posts have to go through a moderator...
i posted a request for information on xservers and got this reply...(this is
why i am asking..i am new).
>>Your posting (Subject: "multiple xservers") has been sent to the
moderator ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") for approval. W
12 matches
Mail list logo
