On July 7, 2001 04:47, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> screen has to be one of the most underrated apps there is. So many
> people don't know about it. I prefer it over kterm's tabbed terminal
> windows and powershell (gnome-terminal-based similar idea) because
> it is all keyboard-driven and you don't nee
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 11:15:46AM +1000 or thereabouts, Mary Gardiner wrote:
>
> A tailor made solution for this kind of thing is the 'screen' utility.
screen has to be one of the most underrated apps there is. So many
people don't know about it. I prefer it over kterm's tabbed terminal
windows
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 01:46:40PM +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:42:07PM -0400, David Merrill wrote:
> > Very cool. The kde virtual terminal (konsole?) allows something very
> > similar, but the various terminals show as tabs on the bottom of the
> > window. Quite slick.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:42:07PM -0400, David Merrill wrote:
> Very cool. The kde virtual terminal (konsole?) allows something very
> similar, but the various terminals show as tabs on the bottom of the
> window. Quite slick.
I use PWM as my window manager, which is very minimalist but allows m
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 11:27:53AM -0700, Akkana wrote:
> I usually just run another copy of mutt in a different shell window.
> Or if I'm not in X (running on the console or over a telnet line),
> I ctrl-Z to suspend the mutt process, use more or vi or another mutt
> or whatever is easiest to vie
