Just the latest update
I tried another NIC last night, and the problem was identical. .
It was another 3c509b, which isn't supposed to have any problems, and i
could try another NIC, but I think i'm going to worry about my router now.
kristin --finder of the ping that works, but not quit
I tried all sorts of versions of ping last night, and was futzing with
traceroute quite a bit. I got *1* packet to RX through my NIC, but since
I wasn't keeping a keen eye on tha stat, I am not sure when it came in and
try as i might, I could not duplicate it.
I had not tried 255.255.255.255, b
Hi Kristin,
At last your problem is solved. I was really surprised thinking
what is going on. If everything is alright then what is the
problem??
And regarding your ping problem i think the problem is with your
DSL router. Are you pinging to the proper
well, i can add my default route now! the problem was that i had the
wrong subnet mask. i have a notebook where I write down all the things i
do to my computer so that i've got a record, and i must have not thought
when i was writing down my subnet mask.
ack!
thank you all SO MUCH for the t
At Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:08:42 -0800 (PST) , Eric Richard Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Kristin Ziel wrote:
>
>>
>> i was just reading over this again, and I am confused on one point. YOu
>> are correct in that if my gateway is 194.200.10.xxx , then my eth0
>> interfac
Eric--
Yeah, I tried that too...just in case, because I know that I had it in my
hosts table before I had to do the reinstall. It didn't help at all. But
thanks for the pointer!
Kristin
> I haven't been following this thread, but I think you need to first add
> your gateway as a host in you
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Kristin Ziel wrote:
>
> i was just reading over this again, and I am confused on one point. YOu
> are correct in that if my gateway is 194.200.10.xxx , then my eth0
> interface should be 194.200.10.yyy, and it IS currently that way...well,
> that's the intention, but it won
i was just reading over this again, and I am confused on one point. YOu
are correct in that if my gateway is 194.200.10.xxx , then my eth0
interface should be 194.200.10.yyy, and it IS currently that way...well,
that's the intention, but it won't let me add the route for the
194.200.10.xxx
I am
cool...this is something new to try! i'll give it a go tonight and let
you know. :)
kristin
> hi kristin
> u can try this:>
>
> first delete any default entry in ur routing table by
> route del default.
> if it gives error message like "no such process" itis ok dont worry.
>
> actually
At Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:10:10 -0600 (CST) , Kristin Ziel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I can get this to you tomorrow...my computer is at home and i have no net
>contact there..
>
>thanks!
>
>> hi kristin
>>
>> send me the output of "route -n" and "ifconfig eth0".
>> i think i can give u the sol
Nicoya--
Some of these I have tried, some not... I'll give them a go tonight and
let you know :)
Kristin
> 1. Can you add a static route that is not your default route? ie. if you're
> adding 192.168.0.0 as your default, try adding a static 192.168.0.[machine's
> ip] netmask 255.255.255.255
At Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:43:15 -0600 (CST) , Kristin Ziel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hi all--
>
>Well, I crashed my computer and had to do a new reinstall. I'm coming up
>with a strange error message, and my search for information on the
>web proved fruitless.
>
>For some reason, I get a "Netw
12 matches
Mail list logo
