On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 08:35:08AM +1100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Mary Gardiner thought:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 08:01:21AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > BiOFH wrote:
> > OOOPS! You're absolutely right!
> >
> >
> > Hrm. EXPERT? PROG (for programmer)?
>
> I prefer PROG actually,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 08:01:21AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BiOFH wrote:
> OOOPS! You're absolutely right!
>
>
> Hrm. EXPERT? PROG (for programmer)?
I prefer PROG actually, since topic-based is probably more useful to
competancy based, or we con use them in conjuction. Equating PROG wi
BiOFH wrote:
> Just a thought that occurred to me based on a recent research side-trip...
> ADV is the subject header some states are requiring (or attempting to
> require) on mass advertising (SPAM) email.
OOOPS! You're absolutely right!
Hrm. EXPERT? PROG (for programmer)?
Jenn V.
--
How about CED?
L.
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, BiOFH wrote:
> Just a thought that occurred to me based on a recent research side-trip...
> ADV is the subject header some states are requiring (or attempting to
> require) on mass advertising (SPAM) email. I was about to add a
> filter to looking for an
EXP (as in expert/experienced) would be a reasonable replacement
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
