The Wiretap gopher (which I need to dig the address out for - used to me
wiretap.spies.com, but it moved...can't remember where to though) has (or
used to, last time I looked - two or more years ago!) a whole bunch of
obsifucated (sp!) C code in relation to compettions years ago.
If anyones i
I got bored...there's nothing much to do in this neck of the woods :) Seemed
like a good idea at the time, and anyhow - I've got a cold so I'm not
thinking straight...[1] :)
Chris...
[1] and pigs might fly :)
Ian wrote...
>
> *points* GEEK!
>
> :)
>
--
@}-,'-
_avian wrote:
> > Yeah and I think there is an obsfucated C code contest somewhere he could enter it
>into. Along with the n ways to do a+b in C. :)
>
> that's right, http://www.ioccc.org
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Alas, it is closed. But I remember being
> Yeah and I think there is an obsfucated C code contest somewhere he could enter it
>into. Along with the n ways to do a+b in C. :)
that's right, http://www.ioccc.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Ian Hall-Beyer wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 1999 22:50:39 +, Chris J/#6 wrote:
>
> *points* GEEK!
>
> :)
>
> --
> wow, this is kinda nifty. the Win98 protocol stack is like a chinese puzzle,
>twist and turn in the right places, and it pops right off.
>
On Thu, 09 Dec 1999 22:50:39 +, Chris J/#6 wrote:
*points* GEEK!
:)
--
wow, this is kinda nifty. the Win98 protocol stack is like a chinese puzzle,
twist and turn in the right places, and it pops right off.
-Seen on EFNet
I'm slowly decoding this - it's actually not too bad. It shows the power (and
potential complexity) of the ?: operator. It's also showing recursion of
main(). It's also showing main() to have non-standard arguments (ie, instead
of:
main (int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
it uses:
