RE: [techtalk] Snort - Sensor and Analyst console HW config

2001-03-24 Thread Angela Nash
on 3, I'd still say 128MB is enough. Jason -Original Message- From: Subba Rao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 12:26 PM To: Angela Nash Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [techtalk] Snort - Sensor and Analyst console HW config On 0, Angela Nash <[EMAIL

Re: [techtalk] Snort - Sensor and Analyst console HW config

2001-03-24 Thread Subba Rao
On 0, Angela Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Snort by itself doesn't seem to use a lot of CPU. What eats up CPU on my > Snort system is the snortsnarf tool that takes the log information and > outputs it to HTML reports. A "reasonably fast" system like a Pentium II or > higher should work jus

RE: [techtalk] Snort - Sensor and Analyst console HW config

2001-03-23 Thread Angela Nash
Snort by itself doesn't seem to use a lot of CPU. What eats up CPU on my Snort system is the snortsnarf tool that takes the log information and outputs it to HTML reports. A "reasonably fast" system like a Pentium II or higher should work just fine. It's not a memory hog either. If you are bui