Re: [techtalk] umm well, one question solved :-)

2000-06-28 Thread Robert Wade
What's the point of dling all of these header files and stuff if you can just dl a tarball from kernel.org and do a compilation that way and besides, it's funner that way. Rober On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Glen Strom wrote: > At 09:02 AM 6/28/00 -0400, Walt wrote: > >Ahoy, > > > >Thanks Glen, I instal

Re: [techtalk] umm well, one question solved :-)

2000-06-28 Thread Glen Strom
At 09:02 AM 6/28/00 -0400, Walt wrote: >Ahoy, > >Thanks Glen, I installed the rhl 6.2 kernel >(2.2.14-5.0) and VOILA my scsi issue disappeared. >That was my first new kernel too, btw... If you're using your system to connect to the internet, you might want to give yourself a little more practice

Re: [techtalk] umm well, one question solved :-)

2000-06-28 Thread Tina Johnsson
> (Still wondering if q2 is available for freebsd though :-) > > Thanks, > Walt Now, freebsd is not my cup of tea.. ;-) But isn't it a glibc system ?? If so, the glibc binary (from www.linuxquake.com) should be fine.. Just make sure you get version 3.20 ;-))) Happy fraggin´ /diffuze -- Tina

[techtalk] umm well, one question solved :-)

2000-06-28 Thread Walt
Ahoy, Thanks Glen, I installed the rhl 6.2 kernel (2.2.14-5.0) and VOILA my scsi issue disappeared. That was my first new kernel too, btw... All I can say is "awesome" :-) (Still wondering if q2 is available for freebsd though :-) Thanks, Walt -~ Anthony's Law of the Workshop: Any to