On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Bilal Muddassir wrote:
> my triton chipset based motherboard has an older bios and it supported my
> new 15gb disk. thats good.
>
> it reports the two quantum fireball disks as udma 2 (older) and udma 4
> (newer) featured
>
> 1. running redhat 6.1 (or any other dist) does
my triton chipset based motherboard has an older bios and it supported my
new 15gb disk. thats good.
it reports the two quantum fireball disks as udma 2 (older) and udma 4
(newer) featured
1. running redhat 6.1 (or any other dist) does linux detect and initialize
udma on the disks by default?
"Caitlyn M. Martin" wrote:
>
> Sorry my answers aren't more useful :(
>
> Regards,
> Caity
Actually Caity, you have been more help than you know. I think I saw an
RPM for RH 6.2 when I installed it. Duh, sometimes I just don't use the
brain God gave me... I;ll take a look. Thanks for triggerin
Hi, Shad,
I can answer your questions, but not in any way that is useful, I'm afraid.
> 1. Samba: is it possible to have smbmount mount a NT share as a user so
> users can read/write to the NT drive. Currently smbmount complanes that
> it need suid set if you want to have users mount drives. Thi
1. Samba: is it possible to have smbmount mount a NT share as a user so
users can read/write to the NT drive. Currently smbmount complanes that
it need suid set if you want to have users mount drives. This is set and
the mount script has bth uid and gid set. But it still refuses to mount
the dir.
