Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-21 Thread Alain Toussaint
my current kernel is: 497855 /boot/vmlinuz and the only modules generated from the kernel build are ppp_deflate.o bsd_comp.o soundcore.o usually,i don't even include modules support in my kernel but i need them to be able to use my sound card (alsa driver only compile as modules),i look forwa

Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-20 Thread Jamie Walker
Kelly Lynn Martin wrote: > >image plus initrd can fit on a floppy-sized image. In our case, the > >limit to kernel size is about 520k or thereabouts. > > Is that the size after bzipping? My current kernel is 422k bzipped, > and I don't have _everything_ moduled out that I possibly could, > alth

Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-20 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:00:21 +1300, Jamie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >We have machines here booting via network card bootROMs from a Novell >server, and we need as much as possible in modules so the kernel >image plus initrd can fit on a floppy-sized image. In our case, the >limit to kernel

Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-20 Thread Jamie Walker
Kelly Lynn Martin wrote: > >You'll save some memory by saying 'm' to things you don't need too > >much, but that's about it. > > Also, you will probably have to put some stuff in modules if you use a > lot of devices because there's a limit to how large your final > monolithic kernel image can b

Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-20 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin
On Sun, 19 Dec 1999 21:50:44 -0500, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >You'll save some memory by saying 'm' to things you don't need too >much, but that's about it. Also, you will probably have to put some stuff in modules if you use a lot of devices because there's a limit to how large your

Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-20 Thread Jeff Dike
> Obviously you would select n for items that you don't need included in > your kernel, but what is the difference in saying y to support for my > scsi or m? For the average user, it doesn't make any difference. You need to say 'y' to anything that you need to boot the kernel (so if you're boot

Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-20 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 09:50:44PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Obviously you would select n for items that you don't need included in > > your kernel, but what is the difference in saying y to support for my > > scsi or m? > > For the average user, it doesn't make any difference. You need to say

Re: [techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-19 Thread moebius
Hey Theresa, Using modules in the kernel is good for when you want a smaller kernel and you don't use the module in question to operate the system. ie -> vfat, ntfs support are better as modules. Scsi support you probably want to compile in the kernel, unless its a card for a scanner or li

[techtalk] modules and xconfig

1999-12-19 Thread Theresa Radke
Hi again folks, got another question for you, When running xconfig I know that the m stands for module, but when would you select module over y? Obviously you would select n for items that you don't need included in your kernel, but what is the difference in saying y to support for my scsi o