Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-07 Thread Jenn V.
Theresa Radke wrote: > > I hit ctrl alt backspace to restart kde and got kicked to a place that said some >weird message > > I got same weird message every time I tried to boot, so I wimped out and >reinstalled. :-) Guess I need to buy a book eh? Or remember what the wierd message is

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-07 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I got same weird message every time I tried to boot, so I wimped out > and reinstalled. :-) Guess I need to buy a book eh? Pay attention to the chapter called "Single-user mode". :-) Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-07 Thread Theresa Radke
I hit ctrl alt backspace to restart kde and got kicked to a place that said some weird message I got same weird message every time I tried to boot, so I wimped out and reinstalled. :-) Guess I need to buy a book eh? On Sun, 02 Jan 2000 11:10:53 -0500 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-03 Thread Theresa Radke
Yea, but you really must have some idea which component is brokeninorder to fix it. On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:04:05 -0600 Aaron Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >Well, while you'll encounter it a lot more in the Windows world, >it's >> >still valid for any OS when you're not entirely sure wh

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-03 Thread Aaron Malone
> >Well, while you'll encounter it a lot more in the Windows world, >it's > >still valid for any OS when you're not entirely sure what >you're doing. :) > > True...but my point was...it is much easier to repair a component in Linux > than it is in Windows. ah, yes. a better phrasing may be "m

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-03 Thread J B
>Well, while you'll encounter it a lot more in the Windows world, >it's >still valid for any OS when you're not entirely sure what >you're doing. :) True...but my point was...it is much easier to repair a component in Linux than it is in Windows. ___

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-03 Thread Aaron Malone
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 07:22:19PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > I remember when I was first learning linux (redhat 2.something, I > > think), there were a couple of times when I screwed something badly > > enough that it was easier (and faster) to reinstall than to learn > > enough (on an unusable

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-03 Thread Aaron Malone
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 03:34:32AM +, J B wrote: > > > > > This is a Windows philosophy...oftimes I find it much easier to reinstall > either NT or 9x than it is to debug the systemThis is especially tru for > NT... Well, while you'll encounter it a lot more in the Windows world, i

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-02 Thread Theresa Radke
> >Emily (it's so *easy* to reinstall... it's so hard to fix stuff when you >don't know where to look to find the necessary documentation) Yep, my sentiments exactly.. _ SignUP For your CorelCity FREE email at http://www.corelc

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-02 Thread J B
Heh. depends on your experience level. I remember when I was first learning linux (redhat 2.something, I think), there were a couple of times when I screwed something badly enough that it was easier (and faster) to reinstall than to learn enough (on an unusable system) to make the system us

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-02 Thread Emily Cartier
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 17:12:06 -0600 Aaron Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:10:53AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > Because I screwed up my linux install, and had to start over yesterday > > > :-) > > > > BTW, what did you do? I'm having trouble thinking of anything s

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-02 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 05:12:06PM -0600, Aaron Malone wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:10:53AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > Because I screwed up my linux install, and had to start over yesterday > > > :-) > > > > BTW, what did you do? I'm having trouble thinking of anything short of > > t

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-02 Thread Jeff Dike
> I remember when I was first learning linux (redhat 2.something, I > think), there were a couple of times when I screwed something badly > enough that it was easier (and faster) to reinstall than to learn > enough (on an unusable system) to make the system usable again. ;) For those of us with s

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-02 Thread Aaron Malone
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:10:53AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Because I screwed up my linux install, and had to start over yesterday > > :-) > > BTW, what did you do? I'm having trouble thinking of anything short of > trashing a disk that would call for a complete reinstall. Heh. depends on

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-02 Thread Jeff Dike
> Because I screwed up my linux install, and had to start over yesterday > :-) BTW, what did you do? I'm having trouble thinking of anything short of trashing a disk that would call for a complete reinstall. Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.l

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread Jeff Dike
> Because I screwed up my linux install, and had to start over yesterday > :-) Gotta hate it when that happens... Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread Theresa Radke
Because I screwed up my linux install, and had to start over yesterday :-) On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 20:48:34 -0500 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am beginning to believe that I sent to wrong place, say >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something.seems strange I did not get >> them back though.

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread Jeff Dike
> I am beginning to believe that I sent to wrong place, say > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something.seems strange I did not get > them back though. Why not go poking through /var/logs/maillog to see what really happened? Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread Theresa Radke
Thanks folks, I am beginning to believe that I sent to wrong place, say [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something.seems strange I did not get them back though... On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 19:09:14 -0500 coder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Theresa Radke wrote: >> >> I've recently sent a few posts that have

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread coder
Theresa Radke wrote: > > I've recently sent a few posts that have not shown up, does anyone else have this >problem ever?? Should I be concerned/? > Ive had posts take up to 3+ hours, perhaps more, to appear on occasion. Can't recall any getting lost. -- .oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread Robert Kiesling
"Theresa Radke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've recently sent a few posts that have not shown up, does anyone else have this >problem ever?? Should I be concerned/? The Reply-to: field of the message header could be set incorrectly. If the original sender set the address to her personal add

Re: [techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread J B
>I've recently sent a few posts that have not shown up, does anyone >else >have this problem ever?? Should I be concerned/? How long has it been since these posts were sent? Occasionally when I send a post I get responses before I even get the post backsomething to do with the way the

[techtalk] missing posts

2000-01-01 Thread Theresa Radke
I've recently sent a few posts that have not shown up, does anyone else have this problem ever?? Should I be concerned/? Theresa _ SignUP For your CorelCity FREE email at http://www.corelcity.com Be one of the first to download t