Ingrid Schupbach wrote:
> > I don't know if I want to inflict a technical group where people are
> > looking for CODE and sources, and stuff, with a long discussion about this.
> > ALTHOUGH if someone has built a DUAL-BOOT LINUX and still uses MICROSOFT
> > for OCCASSIONAL THINGS, like running a
> I don't know if I want to inflict a technical group where people are
> looking for CODE and sources, and stuff, with a long discussion about this.
> ALTHOUGH if someone has built a DUAL-BOOT LINUX and still uses MICROSOFT
> for OCCASSIONAL THINGS, like running a "Tested, Trusted Tool ONE DOESN'T
After talking a number of people on line, this always seems like the "vi
vs. EMACS" debate. In that besides it sounds an awful lot like me saying to
a vi enthusiast "But vi DOESN'T EVEN TRY TO DO WHAT EMACS can..." it would
fast become just some weird argument in the technical sense. Like that
"te
