Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-06-01 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 3:40 PM -0500 6/1/01, Jeff Dike wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I've heard tell about user-mode Linux - it sounds pretty interesting. > >Yup, check it out :-) > >> Another possibility is VMWare. But neither will let you run a Beowulf >> cluster. :-) > >Sure they will. Both will let you

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-06-01 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 12:05 PM -0500 6/1/01, Jeff Dike wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> As far as I'm concerned, it's never possible to have too many >> computers. I mean, how else are you going to: try new distros, learn >> about new hardware, set up firewalls and DNS servers to test, track >> debian testi

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-06-01 Thread Magni Onsoien
Conor Daly: > > > of different ways (I have it set up to check outgoing mails for the word > > > "attach" and if found, check to see if I *did* attach the file), Oh, and > > > > Would you mind sharing how you did that? I forget to attach stuff all > > the time and it makes me feel stupid. :-) >

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-06-01 Thread David Merrill
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:42:37PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > David Merrill thought: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:23:30AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:26:35PM -0400 or so it is rumoured here

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-06-01 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 9:37 AM +0100 6/1/01, Telsa Gwynne wrote: >On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:23:52AM +0100 or thereabouts, Conor Daly wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:26:35PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, >> Michelle Murrain thought: >> > >> > both of the servers I get my mail on (my home server and

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-06-01 Thread Conor Daly
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:42:37PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, David Merrill thought: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:23:30AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:26:35PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > > Michelle Murrain thought: > > > > > > The one minor sn

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-06-01 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:23:52AM +0100 or thereabouts, Conor Daly wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:26:35PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > Michelle Murrain thought: > > > > both of the servers I get my mail on (my home server and work) can do > > IMAP. Problem is, Netscape/Mozilla

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-05-31 Thread David Merrill
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:23:30AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:26:35PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > Michelle Murrain thought: > > > > The one minor snag is that at the same time as I did this change, I > > decided it would be a great time to change from POP

Re: [techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-05-31 Thread Conor Daly
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:26:35PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Michelle Murrain thought: > > The one minor snag is that at the same time as I did this change, I > decided it would be a great time to change from POP to IMAP, since > both of the servers I get my mail on (my home serve

[techtalk] Progeny Debian

2001-05-31 Thread Michelle Murrain
I wanted to give you all a bit of a report on my adventures (actually, lack thereof) in Laptop Linux land. I just installed Progeny Debian on my HP Pavilion N5195. It was painless. Totally painless. Previously, I'd tried to install Debian potato on this laptop, but was unable to get both X to