Re: [techtalk] Linux security suggestions

2001-05-14 Thread coldfire
brian, you didn't really leave anything out hehe .. for the average user, or rather, anyone using linux as a workstation .. there's only 3 real keys to keeping your box secure. disable any services that aren't to be used, get that firewall setup, and keep your software up to date. :) abe On Su

Re: [techtalk] Linux security suggestions

2001-05-14 Thread James Sutherland
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Brian Sweeney wrote: > Last week, against our direct order, a user at my organization put a (near > as we can tell) unpatched RHL6.2 box on the network. He was compromised in > under 12 hours; I haven't gotten the chance to recover the logs to figure > out exactly when. It'

Re: [techtalk] Linux security suggestions

2001-05-14 Thread Magni Onsoien
Brian Sweeney: > "The life expectancy of an unpatched, default installation of Red Hat 6.2 > server is three days. The last time we attempted to confirm this, the system > was compromised in eight hours." > -The Honeynet Project One of the sysadmins at my *old* job left his laptop with Windows 20

Re: [techtalk] Linux security suggestions

2001-05-13 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:22:48PM -0700, Brian Sweeney wrote: > "The life expectancy of an unpatched, default installation of Red Hat 6.2 > server is three days. The last time we attempted to confirm this, the system > was compromised in eight hours." > -The Honeynet Project The only time I've e

[techtalk] Linux security suggestions

2001-05-13 Thread Brian Sweeney
Hey all- Man, we've been active this weekend. I didn't check my mail for a while and I've got >100 messages, LOTS from here. Then I saw the whole troll thing. Yuk. 'Nuff said. But it's nice to know that when a heated topic comes up, once again there are linuxchix all over willing to contribut