Re: [techtalk] Large Disk/glibc/RPM Hell

2001-05-10 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > However, I can't upgrade glibc using rpm, because I need a higher > version of rpm. > I tried installing rpm 4.0.2 from source, but it immediately barfed > and told me I needed a higher glibc. Have you tried rpm --nodeps in one of these strategic places? The new rpm

Re: [techtalk] Large Disk/glibc/RPM Hell

2001-05-10 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 10-May-101 [techtalk] Large Disk/glibc.. by Kai [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm running rpm 3.0.6-6x. To upgrade to util-linux-2.10o or modutils-2.4.0, > I need to have glibc-2.2. My current version is 2.1.2-11. However, I can't > upgrade glibc using rpm, because I need a highe

[techtalk] Large Disk/glibc/RPM Hell

2001-05-10 Thread Kai MacTane
Hi. I'm seeking a way out of RPM hell, and it looks like it involves some rather nasty installs from source. I'll try to describe the problem concisely, but it's a fairly big problem. I have a Red Hat 6.1 box, on which I've been attempting to install an 80 GB IDE drive. As mentioned in the Lar

Re: [techtalk] Biscuit jack?

2001-05-10 Thread minae
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:30:38PM -0700 or thereabouts, Lothan wrote: > > I should apologize up front for the "me too!" but I couldn't resist > > seconding that motion. Google is amazing for all kinds of searches, > > particularly tech searches. Its search results are far more relevant than >

Re: [techtalk] Biscuit jack?

2001-05-10 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:30:38PM -0700 or thereabouts, Lothan wrote: > I should apologize up front for the "me too!" but I couldn't resist > seconding that motion. Google is amazing for all kinds of searches, > particularly tech searches. Its search results are far more relevant than One thing