[techtalk] (no subject)

2000-11-02 Thread antonxie
subscribe<(h™âŽªQÜm§ÿðà \†‰žr‰­Àð¡¢gŽžX§y¬@ÅhÉ~ל†Ö¥’f¢–)à–+-µç!µ©d–)îÅÈbƊà†Ûiÿü0ÂX§»+‚é?™¨¥™©ÿ–+-Šwèþל†Ö¥

Re: [techtalk] Re: OpenBSD vs. Debian 2.2

2000-11-02 Thread Elaine Poulsen
Bek, See www.defcon1.org and www.freebsdrocks.com for sites that have good examples, HOWTOs for FreeBSD. Bek Oberin wrote: > curious wrote: > > Jumping from Debian to OpenBSD requires a little learning curve since > > devices/default shells and lots of commands behave diffrently and use > > dif

RE: [techtalk] Re: OpenBSD vs. Debian 2.2

2000-11-02 Thread Stacie Turner
I am an OpenBSD fan for one simple, selfish reason. I have an internal modem. I spent months tearing my hair out trying to get Linux (Red Hat) to find the modem, trying way to many things and imploring all my local gurus for help, most of whom said something along the line of "get an external mo

Re: [techtalk] Re: OpenBSD vs. Debian 2.2

2000-11-02 Thread Tricia Bowen
So far, I've used Caldera's OpenLinux, RedHat's Linux 6.2, and FreeBSD 4.0. As far as unix commands go, they're all roughly the same. Installations are different. FreeBSD is better for networking and security. Linux is nicer for development. I've had trouble compiling some java programs on Free

Re: [techtalk] OpenBSD vs. Debian 2.2

2000-11-02 Thread sara ruohotie
> "Yes, OpenBSD will run on your multiprocessor machine, but it will only > use one processor. There currently is no support for SMP". just to let you know: freebsd utilizes multiprocessors very fluently. i don't have one, but my husband has and he says he's been very satisfied and pleased on

[techtalk] test mail

2000-11-02 Thread arindamc
this is a test mail arindamc Get your own FREE E-mail address at http://www.linuxfreemail.com Linux FREE Mail is 100% FREE, 100% Linux, and 100% yours! ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk