Re: [techtalk] DNS & Linux

2000-06-02 Thread Melissa Plunkett
I think I can help a bit with the nsswitch.conf vs hosts.conf question. I run NIS and NFS on IRIX so it's a little different but not too much. A quick explaination of NIS (Network Information System)...NIS is a service that allows you to make important information available to other servers/work

Re: [techtalk] source vs. rpm?

2000-06-02 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > There are certain things that you will and should never use an rpm > for.. for example.. apache. Why not? If you've got a server that you take seriously and want control over what modules (and what versions) go into it, you build from source. But for your generic s

[techtalk] FYI:

2000-06-02 Thread karina . hould
Hey Everyone, Just wanted to officially let you all know that I think Jeff is amazing, he has helped me with the Windows file names with spaces in them problem. It is not 100% solved but at least I know now that Windows is well "Special" have a great weekend everyone. thank you again

Re: [techtalk] DNS & Linux

2000-06-02 Thread GeekGrrl
nsswitch.conf seems to be mostly used for NIS situations from what I have found. It is a slightly different critter then host.conf. You will probably have to ask someone else for more details on that as I do not run NIS. On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Stephanie Alarcon wrote: > > You can do this on all Un

Re: [techtalk] source vs. rpm?

2000-06-02 Thread Jenn
you can get src rpms :) Both have a package manager. There are certain things that you will and should never use an rpm for.. for example.. apache. On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Jeff Dike wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > hey, anyone have a minute to explain the differences/advantages > > disadva

Re: [techtalk] source vs. rpm?

2000-06-02 Thread Caitlyn Máire Martin
Hi, Stephanie, and everyone else, Yes, rpms are equivalent to packages in Solaris. rpm is short for "Red Hat Package Manager". Most other major distributions now use rpms. The notable exceptions are Slackware and those based on Debian, including Corel and Storm. They also have a packaging sys

Re: [techtalk] DNS and Apache Server

2000-06-02 Thread Stephanie Alarcon
> You can do this on all Unices and Linux distros. Whether your host > table or dns is looked at for resolution is specified in > /etc/host.conf. It could be one, or the other, or both in various > orders. hey, i didn't know that. well then what about nsswitch.conf? that has this line, which i

Re: [techtalk] DNS and Apache Server

2000-06-02 Thread GeekGrrl
You can do this on all Unices and Linux distros. Whether your host table or dns is looked at for resolution is specified in /etc/host.conf. It could be one, or the other, or both in various orders. Example: order hosts, bind This will look to your hosts file first, then to DNS. On Sat, 3 Jun 2

Re: [techtalk] Memory Usage

2000-06-02 Thread joey tsai
Don't worry about it. The free memory means that the kernel isn't using that RAM for anything better; notice after you ran the program the buffers and caching went up. So, if you try running that program again, you should notice (1) that it starts up faster (since it's cached) and (2) if you ran

Re: [techtalk] source vs. rpm?

2000-06-02 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > hey, anyone have a minute to explain the differences/advantages > disadvantages of source vs rpm? I've installed things both ways, but > i really only know barely enough about them to be dangerous. whenever > i "make" something and it doesn't work i just kinda sit ther

Re: [techtalk] source vs. rpm?

2000-06-02 Thread GeekGrrl
Source: configurable and alterable to your system. Can be used on distributions that do not have RPM or RPM2TGZ type utilities, and any system that -does-. RPM: precompiled source geared towards systems following standards compatible with the RPM utility. I, personally, amd leery of RPMs because

Re: [techtalk] DNS and Apache Server

2000-06-02 Thread Jenn V.
Subba Rao wrote: > > One problem I have noticed is the slow startup of Apache at boot up time on my Linux. > It is trying to resolve the DNS name for this web server. The domainname on my > local LAN is a bogus domain. I do have the WWW server mentioned in the DNS table > > www A

[techtalk] source vs. rpm?

2000-06-02 Thread Stephanie Alarcon
> BTW: Be careful of rpms and make absolutely certain that they are BIND > 8.2.2P5 and not any other version before you use them. Compiling BIND from > source is -very- easy, taking a total of five steps to complete. hey, anyone have a minute to explain the differences/advantages disadvantages of

Re: [techtalk] DNS and Apache Server

2000-06-02 Thread GeekGrrl
The only thing I can see wrong is that you neglected to tell the nameserver which sort of network this record is a part of. The only one that really matters these days is IN, which stands for Internet, which is appropriate in this case. Your record should look like this: www IN A 1

Re: [techtalk] Linux DNS solution?

2000-06-02 Thread GeekGrrl
Whether or not you need to contact a registrar (It's not just the Internic any more) to register your Linux DNS server as a nameserver or not depends on whether you will actually be hosting any domain names or not. If you are just setting up to be a caching nameserver, this is not necessary. Cach

[techtalk] DNS and Apache Server

2000-06-02 Thread Subba Rao
One problem I have noticed is the slow startup of Apache at boot up time on my Linux. It is trying to resolve the DNS name for this web server. The domainname on my local LAN is a bogus domain. I do have the WWW server mentioned in the DNS table www A 10.5.28.11 What entries a

Re: [techtalk] Linux DNS solution?

2000-06-02 Thread Elaine Poulsen
Sally, Get BIND ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind/src/8.2.2-P5/bind-src.tar.gz It should compile and install easily on Linux. You can also probably get rpms for bind if you use redhat or friends. If this is your first experience with DNS then buy the Orielly book DNS and BIND by Cricket Liu. It is re

Re: [techtalk] wvdial problem

2000-06-02 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I am automatically disconnected. Is there an easy way to either a) > disable the auto disconnect feature or b)extend that to a more > reasonable time constraint (20-30 minutes would be fine). I use diald, which I got because it provides demand dialling, but it also c

[techtalk] Linux DNS solution?

2000-06-02 Thread Sally_Hutchinson
Hi all, I have just a quick question: How would a linux box be used as a DNS server? Thanks -Sally ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] wvdial problem

2000-06-02 Thread moebius
Hey X, My suggestion would be to start by turning on the debug command for ppp. It will log you ppp connection to the kernel messages (usu. /var/log/messages) and try to recreate being disconnected. If that gives you nothing to go on then it's probably your isp that disconnects you after a certa

Re: [techtalk] wvdial problem

2000-06-02 Thread Jenn V.
Cat Pooka wrote: > Here's a question. I'm using the wvdial function to connect, but if I'm browsing >and stop for more than 10 minutes on a single site (like when reading longish >linuxchix posts about gun control) I am automatically disconnected. Is there an easy >way to either a) disable

[techtalk] wvdial problem

2000-06-02 Thread Cat Pooka
So, I'm new to the Linux groove, but I'm enjoying learning. For those curious, I worked with one of the free distributions off the net (I don't remember which, my bad) until I saw a SuSe box for $30 with all the software I could ever need. (Including MySQL and the WordStar apps which claim to

[techtalk] Memory Usage

2000-06-02 Thread Beverly Guillermo
Here's my scenario -- I start my linux box and check my available memory space with 'free' and get the following: - total used free sharedbufferscached Mem:258104 38564 2