Excerpts from linuxchix: 8-Apr-100 [techtalk] ftp_masq stopped.. by
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> any clues? or more information needed?
Is the module loaded?
Is it still loaded when it stops working?
Does passive ftp work?
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL P
This _seems_ just a little odd to me...
I use a windows system to layout some
of the web pages that I do. I upload them
out through my rhl server via ip masq. and
ip_masq_ftp. This has worked fine once.
But now, even with the
/sbin/depmod -a
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
lines in my rc.local fil
My boyfriend and I both set up WinCVS to access a
friend's CVS server. It worked fine under dial-up. We recently got
DSL and both have static IPs. I can still log in to CVS just fine, but he
no longer can. The command 'cvs login' prompts for a password, then
immediately prints the error
Amy wrote:
> I am not at home at the moment, so I can't look in the system log, but
> I noticed if I log out in Gnome and select shutdown, it shuts down
> properly. If I try and just type shutdown now while not running Gnome,
> it stops at a bash prompt. When I type 'exit' at the bash prompt, it
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> I think the thing to do is figure out what state the machine is in. Does the
> bash prompt work? What's running at that point? What runlevel is the machine
> in? Any strange messages in the system log?
>
> Jeff
I am
> When I try to shutdown the machine to reboot into Windows when I need
> to, it no longer shuts down. It stops at a bash prompt. I always used
> shutdown now and had no problems, but it doesn't seem to work now.
> Any suggestions as to how to fix this?
I think the thing to do is figure out wh
Everything was working great with my RH 6.1 until my sister somehow
crashed my machine while I was at work. I walked her through the
rebooting process and everything seemed to go well. When I try to shutdown
the machine to reboot into Windows when I need to, it no longer shuts
down. It stops at
On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 11:47:19PM -0400, Margaret Leber wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Andrea Zamecnik wrote:
> > If they were really, then Java would be suitable for systems programming.
> > Which it's not.
>
> That's a pretty broad generalization. The run-time environments we've
> seen thus fa
