Re: [techtalk] initrd/kernel building

2000-01-08 Thread moebius
Hey There, If you have redhat's install guide the initrd image is mentioned in detail for recompiling in the scsi section. My guide is at work so I can't tell you what page. But their guide is online. HTH, Harry Hoffman Product Systems Specialist Restaurants Unlimited Inc. Seattle WA 206 634-3082

[techtalk] thanks

2000-01-08 Thread Gustavo Sudre
hi guys I'm not sure about the police of this list, but if i'm doing something wrong sending this email only to thank that answer about gtk+ and libc, tell me, ok? Oh, thanks :) Gustavo Sudre Rio de Janeiro - Brazil UIN: 2065075 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.l

Re: [techtalk] initrd/kernel building

2000-01-08 Thread Jeff Dike
> Or, can I just not bother with initrd? Is it worth having? You don't need it. You should also probably change the kernel version number if it would otherwise be the same as what you've already got. What I did was make EXTRAVERSION=a, so that the new kernel version was 2.2.5a rather than th

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-08 Thread Robert Kiesling
"Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The list also specifically says not to tell people to RTFM. I appreciate > that that was not your intention, but I recall glancing at your answer and > thinking 'uh, that's perilously close to a blunt RTFM. A newbie is going to > be put off and upset by tha

Re: [techtalk] POP mail security

2000-01-08 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 8-Jan-100 Re: [techtalk] POP mail sec.. by "Jenn V."@simegen.com > if I know I'm planning to search a man page I pipe > it through less. I can save myself a step now. :) If you prefer less, you can set the environment variable PAGER to less. It can be set to anything, b