Thanks to everyone that posted regarding my resolution situation.
I ended up using the Xconfigurator and holy high res batman! its great!!!
The only thing that I notice is it looks a bit 'watery' when i scroll through a
page quicklybut at least i can fit a decent number of windows on my d
Renata--
Nope..I have had almost no chance to really get tweaking on this
box... so i haven't upgraded anything since i
installed the OS except netscape...and i did install staroffice, but haven't
had a chance to use it even one time..
kristin
On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13,
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, LeeAnn Bevell wrote:
> My problem is somewhat different from yours. My installation
> apparently works, but when I run it, the windows update so
> slowly that it is unusable. (The windows in the installation
> program also updated slowly - at one point I got a black screen
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Stephan Zaniolo wrote:
> To all who helped on the GPL question, thanks!!! :^) :^) I presented the
> option today so now it's out of my hands, for a while anyway.
>
> Now I have a new question. (This one's for my own comp :^) Does anyone
> know where I can get
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, K. Ziel wrote:
> So...is there an easier way than running through that entire config again?
> also..i've run xsetres on solaris before, but didn't seem to be able to find
> anything similar on my system (redhat)
Run "Xconfigurator" as root on redhat based systems. Note: If
At 09:55 PM 11/12/99 -0600, Stephan Zaniolo wrote:
> Now I have a new question. (This one's for my own comp :^) Does anyone
>know where I can get a tool to (easily) create PDF files in Linux? (Note:
>cheaper is better. ;^)
The only reason I know the answer to this one is because I
asked
On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 08:15:59AM , Darren Osadchuk wrote:
> My lingering question is: how do you get rid of the virtual desktop? I was
> able to remove it for the 1024x768 resolution by removing any reference in
> XF86Config to higher resolutions. But there's still a (1024x768) virtual
> deskto
At one point I had accidently ran arpwatch on one of our linux rh6 boxes and I was
able to see ipaddress with the host name
I'm not sure how I even got to this point.
Well know I have another linux box that does dns host name resolution internal to our
network and I want to make sure I have no d
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Cathy James wrote:
> Has anyone else had problems installing StarOffice?
> I'm wondering if it is due to a glibc2.0 vs glibc2.1
> conflict. My machine has glic2.1 installed.
I recall SO 5.0 having this problem, but 5.1 wors well here (RHL 6.0&6.1).
Which version do yo
