aloha,
The Community Council is continuing it's catch up with boards and councils
within the Ubuntu project to make sure there is nothing slipping through
the cracks when it comes to staying in touch. It's be pretty informal,just
updates and to let us know if there is anything you wish to bring
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:30:30PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:18:01PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> >
> > It seems the regular reviewing days got dropped some time ago.
>
> This is, in essence, the only real problem we have. We set up this
> lovely rotation, and then on
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:00:01PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
>
> Given that Launchpad API doesn't expose a way to contact users, what
> would be the best way of sending the uploader of a package being
> rejected email?
Ideally, fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/31750 would
be the
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:44:50AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Brian Murray [2013-05-23 15:00 -0700]:
> > Given that Launchpad API doesn't expose a way to contact users, what
> > would be the best way of sending the uploader of a package being
> > rejected email?
>
> I've seldomly actually done th
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:18:01PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello SRU team,
>
> the Tech board recently received a proposal to forego the review of
> -proposed uploads and directly accept them into -proposed:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2013-May/001613.html
> https://lis
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:19:14PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Brian Murray [2013-05-24 8:00 -0700]:
> >
> > Having said that, I currently don't reject things because there is not a
> > good way to communicate the reason for rejection to the uploader.
>
> Why is following up in the bug not a goo
I expired out of ubuntu-core-dev, which apparently caused me to be removed
from ubuntumembers (techboard isn't in ubuntumembers). This has caused
m...@ubuntu.com to start bouncing, which is the email address I used to
subscribe to technical-board@lists, so I'm no longer receiving tech board
email.
On 05/24/2013 01:28 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I expired out of ubuntu-core-dev, which apparently caused me to be removed
> from ubuntumembers (techboard isn't in ubuntumembers). This has caused
> m...@ubuntu.com to start bouncing, which is the email address I used to
> subscribe to technical-boa
It's a UK bank holiday today, so I won't be around this evening.
I believe it's a US public holiday too; should we defer the meeting?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
On 05/27/2013 10:22 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> It's a UK bank holiday today, so I won't be around this evening.
>
> I believe it's a US public holiday too; should we defer the meeting?
Sounds good, we don't appear to have much to discuss this month anyway
(agenda is empty and not seeing anything o
Colin Watson [2013-05-27 15:22 +0100]:
> It's a UK bank holiday today, so I won't be around this evening.
>
> I believe it's a US public holiday too; should we defer the meeting?
WFM; the only pending topic that I can see is the discussion of the
OpenSSL licensing issue (which we already deferred
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Colin Watson [2013-05-27 15:22 +0100]:
> > It's a UK bank holiday today, so I won't be around this evening.
> >
> > I believe it's a US public holiday too; should we defer the meeting?
>
> WFM; the only pending topic that I can see is
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 09:16:12AM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 01:28 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I expired out of ubuntu-core-dev, which apparently caused me to be removed
> > from ubuntumembers (techboard isn't in ubuntumembers). This has caused
> > m...@ubuntu.com to start bo
Adam Conrad [2013-05-24 12:48 -0600]:
> And, even in the SRU case, you might have an SRU that addresses 24
> bugs: which one do you follow up on? All 24? The first in the list?
This is a rare case, but in that case I used any bug which was set up
with the SRU description, or if that was missing,
Steve Langasek [2013-05-24 13:19 -0700]:
> There are definitely times when I have a sense that the SRUs in the queue
> are not the best use of our time. Every developer has their own idea of
> what's important enough to SRU, and it's difficult as an SRU team member to
> be in the position of arbit
Hello fellow TBers,
Laura Czajkowski [2013-05-27 10:06 +0100]:
> We'd like for some representatives of your board to join us at our
> next meeting for this on Thursday, 30th May, 2013 at 17:00 UTC.
I'm on holiday and in the mountains this Wed to Saturday, so I cannot
join this. Does anyone else h
16 matches
Mail list logo
