On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:31:59PM -0700, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 17/05/12 20:13, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote:
> > Mark - I know you've felt strongly in the past about having a Chair on
> > Boards and Councils, but do we have the specifics of this role
> > documented? Perhaps it is it time to re
Yes, we do have escalation mechanisms, and having the chair act as a
tiebreaker only to have the decision escalated would be demoralising for
the tiebreaker (we could of course get better about declining to review
decisions if on the face of them they were properly made).
After discussing this in
Hi Tech Board,
I just wanted to send a friendly reminder for some comments on this. It
was sent during UDS, so i'm sure it could have easily gotten lost in an
e-mail backlog.
Thanks!
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Hi Tech Board,
>
> Kate Steward recommended that I
