Kees Cook [2014-05-12 13:57 -0700]:
> Okay, sure. I may be late from time to time, but that can work.
Great, thanks! I put in the new time on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoardAgenda then, i. e. 2014-05-27,
17:00 London time / 16:00 UTC.
I also asked Matt Zimmerman to update the fridge calend
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:19:53PM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> On 14-05-08 10:09 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Martin Pitt [2014-04-30 10:46 +0200]:
> >> http://doodle.com/zmi9m7gfwtyczg5s
> >
> > Now everyone added themselves. Unfortunately there's not a single time
> >
On 14-05-08 10:09 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Martin Pitt [2014-04-30 10:46 +0200]:
>> http://doodle.com/zmi9m7gfwtyczg5s
>
> Now everyone added themselves. Unfortunately there's not a single time
> when everybody is available, just some which are all-but-one:
>
> * Monday 19 to
Hello again,
Martin Pitt [2014-04-30 10:46 +0200]:
> http://doodle.com/zmi9m7gfwtyczg5s
Now everyone added themselves. Unfortunately there's not a single time
when everybody is available, just some which are all-but-one:
* Monday 19 to 21: all but Martin
* Tuesday and Thursday 18 to 20: all
Hello all,
sorry for again missing the meeting on Monday. Last weeks were
particularly affected by lots of travel and various holidays, but in
general Monday 22:00 is a really bad time for me.
We haven't actually discussed the meeting time with the
not-so-new-anymore board yet, so I crea
ed
> between three different time slots now, and at least for me we keep
> between switching between "impossible" and "really inconvenient".
>
> As this keeps causing confusion, and there is very little rationale
> for binding our meeting time to UTC (given that w
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:19:52AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> As this keeps causing confusion, and there is very little rationale
> for binding our meeting time to UTC (given that we are all on the
> Northern hemisphere), can we agree to always have the meeting at 21:00
> Lond
On 11/13/2012 04:20 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:19:52AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> As this keeps causing confusion, and there is very little rationale
>> for binding our meeting time to UTC (given that we are all on the
>> Northern hemisphere), c
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:19:52AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> As this keeps causing confusion, and there is very little rationale
> for binding our meeting time to UTC (given that we are all on the
> Northern hemisphere), can we agree to always have the meeting at 21:00
> London time
2012/11/13 Martin Pitt :
> As this keeps causing confusion, and there is very little rationale
> for binding our meeting time to UTC (given that we are all on the
> Northern hemisphere), can we agree to always have the meeting at 21:00
> London time?
21:00 London time is fine with me
uot;.
As this keeps causing confusion, and there is very little rationale
for binding our meeting time to UTC (given that we are all on the
Northern hemisphere), can we agree to always have the meeting at 21:00
London time?
If that doesn't work for you, I'd like to set up a Doodle to
On 08/20/2012 12:01 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> as you undoubtedly noticed, I have some serious trouble making it to
> the 23:00 CEST meeting these days. When we set up the meeting time, we
> agreed on adjusting it to summer time, and indeed we did in the first
> co
Hello all,
as you undoubtedly noticed, I have some serious trouble making it to
the 23:00 CEST meeting these days. When we set up the meeting time, we
agreed on adjusting it to summer time, and indeed we did in the first
couple of weeks, but these days it seems the meeting has been put to
21:00
Just to fill everyone in: At the last meeting, we decided to keep the
current meeting time as defined in UTC. Specifically, the meeting will
stay at 2100 UTC and will be held every other Monday (i.e. nothing has
changed). Sorry for not pointing this out sooner.
--
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Developer
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:50:54AM -0800, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I noticed in the meeting notes that it's been proposed to move the TB
> meeting time; since the current time is in one of the few "impossible" hours
> for me, I definitely support that ;-)
>
>
Hey folks,
I noticed in the meeting notes that it's been proposed to move the TB
meeting time; since the current time is in one of the few "impossible" hours
for me, I definitely support that ;-)
Rather than ask everyone what times they prefer, perhaps a better approach
would be
16 matches
Mail list logo
