targeted at christos mostly.
I saw the GSOC posting that inetd needs some love.
About me: I'm a student at the University of New Mexico. I'm not afraid to
dig my hands into a codebase and fix things, add things or otherwise get
work done. My projects have primarily been "Take this existing
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:48:32 -0700, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article ,
Morgan ``indrora'' Gangwere wrote:
[trimmed]
Yes, I think that a per-service file with better syntax is probably the
way to go. I think that it is not worth enhancing more the existing
syntax.
I
@cristos / world,
My proposal draft is available:
http://tsunami.zaibatsutel.net/gsoc16_netbsd_proposal.txt
I'd appreciate any feedback which can help rough out any edges seen.
--
Morgan Gangwere
www: zaibatsutel.net twitter; @indrora (also GH)
Some confirmation as I clean up my proposal:
What are the overarching goals behind a preforking inetd? What specific
cases can we look at for testing?
This comes after a little confusion amongst myself and Riastradh on
IRC.
Currently, I know of no services that are easily deployed on inetd
exce
