Re: new tool: nbupgrade(8)

2024-05-02 Thread Valery Ushakov
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 06:52:13 +, nia wrote: > hey, I wrote this script to replace sysupgrade (but maintainable and > not using a weird shell library), would be nice to import it. Just a quick drive-by question: [how] can one use it for self-compiled sets? -uwe

Re: new tool: nbupgrade(8)

2024-05-02 Thread Sunil Nimmagadda
Cc: tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org... Thanks for the tool, needed to apply this patch to upgrade an aarch64 head vm on qemu. There are some more warnings/errors flagged by shellcheck, attempted to fix a few... # nbupgrade -r head --- nbupgrade.sh.orig 2024-05-01 08:32:33.026017291 +0530 +++ nbupg

Re: new tool: nbupgrade(8)

2024-05-02 Thread nia
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 04:50:21PM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 06:52:13 +, nia wrote: > > > hey, I wrote this script to replace sysupgrade (but maintainable and > > not using a weird shell library), would be nice to import it. > > Just a quick drive-by question: [ho

Reproducible builds: Recent Changes & Current State

2024-05-02 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! Some time ago, I started to look into NetBSD's success after reaching reproducibility for at least two ports. Being both a VAX enthusiast and somebody running CI builds for NetBSD current, I used that infrastructure to work on reproducibility for VAX, as a cross-build target building on a Linu

Re: Reproducible builds: Recent Changes & Current State

2024-05-02 Thread Jason High
This is very interesting, thank you. I hope this ends up as a research paper. jhigh On Thu, May 2, 2024, 15:53 Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Hi! > > Some time ago, I started to look into NetBSD's success after reaching > reproducibility for at least two ports. Being both a VAX enthusiast > and som