Re: alloca again

2022-10-05 Thread nia
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 12:21:08AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:31:42PM +, nia wrote: > > I'd argue that providing alloca(3) as anything except a compiler > > builtin is a bug, and that kind of thing should never be used. > > Well, if you are in strict C/C++ st

Re: alloca again

2022-10-05 Thread Valery Ushakov
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 12:06:10 +, nia wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 12:21:08AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:31:42PM +, nia wrote: > > > I'd argue that providing alloca(3) as anything except a compiler > > > builtin is a bug, and that kind of thing sh

Re: alloca again

2022-10-05 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:22:23AM +, David Holland wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 12:41:07AM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 18:32:47 +, David Holland wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 03:45:06PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote: > > > > > This is the curre

Re: alloca again

2022-10-05 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
Am Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 12:06:10PM + schrieb nia: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 12:21:08AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:31:42PM +, nia wrote: > > > I'd argue that providing alloca(3) as anything except a compiler > > > builtin is a bug, and that kind of thing