On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:08:39AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 12:03:21PM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> > > Well, there is lout to consider.
> > [...]
> > > I've never used it for manpage rendering though! A simple `awk'
> > > script could indeed do it as its format i
> Yeah, who uses rendering a manpage in a tight loop ;) If it runs on
> the older machines in a few seconds I don't think its going to be an
> issue. And it isn't that slow is it?
As someone who still routinely uses "older machines", if it is
significantly slower than nroff, it will be a problem
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:16:49PM +0100, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> > > Right, and in my experience it would be completely unsuitable. :)
> > >
> > > Now, don't get me wrong, I love Lout and and when I need a batch
> > > formatter it's what I use unless there are strong overriding reasons.
> >
> However, I took a quick look at the source yesterday and it seems the
> code comes as 52 source files numbered 01-52, which is not, shall we
> say, entirely auspicious. :-|
Well, any decent C programmer would have called them z00.c through z51.c.
Hi,
when I run lint with the -t flag for traditional C (which means before
C90), I always get these warnings:
$ >empty.c
$ lint -t empty.c
(1): warning: 'long double' is illegal in traditional C [266]
(1): warning: function prototypes are illegal in traditional C [270]
(2): warning: 'long double
> On Mar 16, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Roland Illig wrote:
>
> Any objections to removing the -t flag and everything that belongs to it?
No objections from me.
-- thorpej
