James Browning writes:
> maintainers at their own discretion. Some of you brought up the concern of
> over-automating the system at the potential risk of the configuration system
> becoming too opaque and administrators allowing packages to configure inetd
> without their knowledge of what is ha
Hello
I did spend some time to improve the ldap support in racoon(8).
It's now working fine for me.
Would anyone object enabling ldap support by default ?
See attached patch
--
Manuel Bouyer
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Index: Makefile
===
Date:Wed, 25 Nov 2020 03:46:43 +
From:David Holland
Message-ID: <20201125034643.ga1...@netbsd.org>
| but modulo the possibility of passing flags to
| daemons there's only one correct way to define any given inetd
| service. They are not configuration in the
> I run servers on non-standard ports (doesn't everyone?)
No. My inetd.conf has no standard servers on non-standard ports - I
just checked my main desktop machine and my main house router. (They
have non-standard servers on non-standard ports, but that's the use
case I mentioned of wanting to ru
