Re: recent changes to pthread_fork.c:fork() cause static linking to fail if the app provides its own malloc()

2020-07-16 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article , Greg A. Woods wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >At Tue, 14 Jul 2020 20:05:57 - (UTC), chris...@astron.com (Christos >Zoulas) wrote: >Subject: Re: recent changes to pthread_fork.c:fork() cause static >linking to fail if the app provides its own malloc() >> >> It is not only _malloc_prefork(),

Re: style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements

2020-07-16 Thread Mouse
> E.g. web browsers just reflow the text when you change the window > width. Why don=E2=80=99t we have this for code editors? Short answer: try to build it and you'll see. Longer answer: Because the exact layout of `words' affects readability of code far more than it does running text. Consider

Re: style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements

2020-07-16 Thread Rhialto
On Thu 16 Jul 2020 at 13:08:49 -0400, Ted Lemon wrote: > It sounds like we need a better tool. FWIW, when actually working on > code, I've found that 120 is a better width than 80 -- with 80, there are > just too many line breaks. But I don't mean to say that your > preference is wrong -- what su

Re: recent changes to pthread_fork.c:fork() cause static linking to fail if the app provides its own malloc()

2020-07-16 Thread David Brownlee
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 15:40, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > In article <7171.1594774...@splode.eterna.com.au>, > matthew green wrote: > >Martin Husemann writes: > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > >> > Replacing malloc is just as invalid from a strict standard

Re: recent changes to pthread_fork.c:fork() cause static linking to fail if the app provides its own malloc()

2020-07-16 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 08:28:29PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 15:40, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > > > In article <7171.1594774...@splode.eterna.com.au>, > > matthew green wrote: > > >Martin Husemann writes: > > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenber

Re: style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements

2020-07-16 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 09:18 -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > At Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:48:07 -0400 (EDT), Mouse > wrote: > Subject: Re: style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements > > > > Slavishly always > > adding them makes it difficult to keep code from walking into the right > >

autoconf-2.69b released [beta]

2020-07-16 Thread Zack Weinberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 We are pleased to announce beta release 2.69b of GNU Autoconf. This release includes eight years of development work since the previous release, 2.69. See below for the detailed list of changes since the previous version, as summarized by the NEWS

Re: style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements

2020-07-16 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jul 16, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > Text line length does matter to those of us who put several > copies of code side by side. It sounds like we need a better tool. FWIW, when actually working on code, I’ve found that 120 is a better width than 80—with 80, there are just too m