On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 07:38:34AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
>
> and mounted. So, so what if you get / first and then have to wait for
> the rest of the fsck's to happen vs a fsck of a single large file
> system? At the end of the day it will take about the same amount f time
> to get the machine
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>
> Moving part of the system to /usr was a *necessary evil* when it was done.
> There is no real rhyme nor reason to what's in /bin vs /usr/bin, even less
> to /sbin vs /usr/sbin, except "huh, I need _this_ and I'm willing to ma
Date:Mon, 3 Feb 2020 22:57:21 +0100
From:Joerg Sonnenberger
Message-ID: <20200203215721.ga26...@bec.de>
| I don't think the size distribution for / is really that much different
| from most of /usr.
Most of /usr or all of /usr ?
jinx$ df -i / /usr
Filesystem
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:45:22PM -, Michael van Elst wrote:
>
> Then you have a running system that can e.g. talk to the network.
> Better than fighting against WAPBL with a damaged journal that
> you cannot skip.
>
Well, rationally, there is no guarantee that won't happen with a
separate
At Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:00:13 +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
Subject: merging /usr/bin etc. to / (was: Solving the syslogd problem)
>
> > This is elegant and I would like to see it. Just remove /usr entirely and
> > collapse its contents into / - no /usr/bin, no /usr/lib, etc.
>
> This thread started b
