On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:00:55AM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote:
> I agree with Roy here, if we add the call we should spit out the
> version of the curses lib.
The ELF version has no meaning though. If anything, keep a date of the
last visible interface change.
Joerg
On 28.08.2019 14:50, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:00:55AM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote:
>> I agree with Roy here, if we add the call we should spit out the
>> version of the curses lib.
>
> The ELF version has no meaning though. If anything, keep a date of the
> last visible i
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 28.08.2019 14:50, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:00:55AM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote:
> >> I agree with Roy here, if we add the call we should spit out the
> >> version of the curses lib.
> >
> > The ELF v
On 28.08.2019 21:58, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 28.08.2019 14:50, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:00:55AM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote:
I agree with Roy here, if we add the call we should spit out the
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:54:54AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Where 8.2 is taken from the .so version?
> > > >
> > > > Roy
> >
> > I think that it would be confused with NetBSD release and it could be
> > meaningless/confusing for downstream users that just pick the code as is
> >
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42:13PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:54:54AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Where 8.2 is taken from the .so version?
> > > > >
> > > > > Roy
> > >
> > > I think that it would be confused with NetBSD release and it could
