Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:49:33 + (UTC)
From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
Message-ID:
| That is already; termios.h is a symlink to that.
| Try to move it there. I doubt it will cause any disruption. We might
| be able to save creating another header
On Oct 21, 10:50am, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: FYI: POSIX update - SIGWINCH and 'struct winsize' (etc) to be
| Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:49:33 + (UTC)
| From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
| Message-ID:
|
| | That is already;
On Oct 21, 3:42pm, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: FYI: POSIX update - SIGWINCH and 'struct winsize' (etc) to be
| Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:49:33 + (UTC)
| From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
| Message-ID:
|
| | That is already;
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:20:20 -0400
From:chris...@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
Message-ID: <20171021132020.e84a517f...@rebar.astron.com>
| Why don't we unconditionally (not only when _NETBSD_SOURCE) include
| from and only make visible struct winsize
| when _N
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 09:20:20AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Why don't we unconditionally (not only when _NETBSD_SOURCE) include
> from and only make visible struct winsize
> when _NETBSD_SOURCE is not defined?
Just provide two definitions and protect them with an include guard. No
need re
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 17:15:27 +0200
From:Joerg Sonnenberger
Message-ID: <20171021151526.ga17...@britannica.bec.de>
| Just provide two definitions and protect them with an include guard. No
| need really to have a new header either.
Obviously that would work, but
On 21.10.2017 19:12, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 17:15:27 +0200
> From:Joerg Sonnenberger
> Message-ID: <20171021151526.ga17...@britannica.bec.de>
>
> | Just provide two definitions and protect them with an include guard. No
> | need really to have a
Hi,
I just wrote a draft[1] for subject, alongside with small script[2] for
testing and demonstration purposes. It is my personal hobby project and
I will be grateful for comments and thoughts.
1 - https://github.com/aniou/cof/wiki/Draft
2 - https://github.com/aniou/cof
Regards,
--
Piotr 'aniou
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 03:42:20PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:49:33 + (UTC)
> From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
> Message-ID:
>
> | That is already; termios.h is a symlink to that.
> | Try to move it there. I doubt it w
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:59:57 +0200
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <513a5aac-d68e-a3da-bd28-9e5cd63ab...@gmx.com>
| We can follow the approach. Add a dedicated header for
| a struct and include where needed.
That's what I currently have, it is easy, clean, a
In article <5474.1508638...@andromeda.noi.kre.to>,
Robert Elz wrote:
>Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:59:57 +0200
>From:Kamil Rytarowski
>Message-ID: <513a5aac-d68e-a3da-bd28-9e5cd63ab...@gmx.com>
>
> | We can follow the approach. Add a dedicated header for
> | a struct
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2017 03:09:04 + (UTC)
From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
Message-ID:
| There is this:
Yes, you mentioned that one yesterday, that is certainly a possibility,
though it does mean that apps that include (most likely
indirectly because of
On 22.10.2017 06:04, Robert Elz wrote:
> Maybe that doesn't matter (or not much), as it is very rare (I think) to
> ever see anything compiled on NetBSD without _NETBSD_SOURCE being defined
> (isn't it?) and what happens for compiles not on NeBSD isn't relevant for
> this discussion (nothing is aff
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2017 05:59:41 +0200
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <1fba73e6-6ef5-ae30-4a3d-570db32fb...@gmx.com>
| As far as I can tell, if something defines a namespace like
| _POSIX_SOURCE, it excludes _NETBSD_SOURCE. I've not researched the
| source of t
On 22.10.2017 06:22, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2017 05:59:41 +0200
> From:Kamil Rytarowski
> Message-ID: <1fba73e6-6ef5-ae30-4a3d-570db32fb...@gmx.com>
>
> | As far as I can tell, if something defines a namespace like
> | _POSIX_SOURCE, it excludes _NET
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:32:26 +0200
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <4aceadc4-7cd6-989d-c9cb-abaa8e103...@gmx.com>
| What UNIX-like systems skip ioctl(2)s
Probably none, since 7th edition (there was no ioctl before that)
but posix does not define ioctl, so anyth
16 matches
Mail list logo
