On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:36:37PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Sorry, wrong rant. That was for the TLS destructor problem where similar
> crude hacks exist. The FreeBSD "solution" is still wrong. Introducing
> __pthread_cxa_finalize or even a public interface for that is fine.
> Iterating ov
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:20:53AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:36:37PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Sorry, wrong rant. That was for the TLS destructor problem where similar
> > crude hacks exist. The FreeBSD "solution" is still wrong. Introducing
> > __pthread
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:28:02AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> This is quite fragile as it effectively means that the handler should
> only ever be a function the current DSO, since other modules may want to
> register the very same handler too.
Yes, but it gives just enough rope to deal wi
