On Jul 26, 8:15pm, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: updates?
| Hi Christos,
| This patch fixed the bug you found
|
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0006-bug-fix-for-real-time-signals.patch
|
Ok, I think that:
1. sp ca
On Jul 27, 8:23am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: updates?
| 3. there will be a concern if we count the number of signals each time,
| but this sigcnts logic may can be merged with siggetinfo.
Can you try doing that?
| 2. I can add kassert around ret.
| 1. I know
3. there will be a concern if we count the number of signals each time,
but this sigcnts logic may can be merged with siggetinfo.
2. I can add kassert around ret.
1. I know sp cannot be NULL, and if it is NULL, the sigcnt is zero, what do
you mean of code would die (which piece of code)?
2016-07-2
Yeah, I will try to improve the code efficiency.
2016-07-27 10:14 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> On Jul 27, 8:23am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | 3. there will be a concern if we count the number of signals each time,
> | but this sigcnts logic ma
This patch
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0007-improve-efficiency.patch
improves the code efficiency and removes duplicate search in the signal
queue.
2016-07-27 10:34 GMT-07:00 Charles Cui :
> Yeah, I will try to improve the code efficiency.
>
> 2
