Re: vacation(1) addition

2023-04-13 Thread Hauke Fath
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:49:15 +0100, David Brownlee wrote: > No direct comments (apart from thanks for the tweak :), but wondered > it it's worth pulling up into netbsd-{10,9,8} ? I think so, but I wanted to wait for any re-percussions. I am using the patch on a netbsd-9 mailserver. Cheerio, Hauk

Re: vacation(1) addition

2023-04-13 Thread David Brownlee
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 11:06, Hauke Fath wrote: > > At 13:55 Uhr +0200 06.04.2023, Hauke Fath wrote: > >Gitlab added "Auto-Submitted: auto-generated" to its mail, which > >vacation(1) does not check for, but only "Precedence:". vacation will, > >on the other hand, set "Auto-Submitted: auto-generat

Re: vacation(1) addition

2023-04-13 Thread Hauke Fath
At 13:55 Uhr +0200 06.04.2023, Hauke Fath wrote: >Gitlab added "Auto-Submitted: auto-generated" to its mail, which >vacation(1) does not check for, but only "Precedence:". vacation will, >on the other hand, set "Auto-Submitted: auto-generated" in its response, >but not "Precedence:". > >The enclose

vacation(1) addition

2023-04-06 Thread Hauke Fath
All, recently, one of my users voiced confusion about a bounced vacation(1) response to a local gitlab server instance's mail. Apart from the gitlab instance trying to submit a mail from a non-whitelisted address to the wrong mailserver, it turned out that both vacation(1) and gitlab thought