om there.
>
> If you have time and energy to write and maintain code, I'm all for it.
I am also one of the maintainers of it, and I very much welcome co-maintaining
this with Sevan.
> However, unix(3lua) will create a fragmentation: if you write code for
> POSIX-compatible OS (e.
> Am 19.05.2018 um 13:43 schrieb Sevan Janiyan :
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 17/05/2018 14:48, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> If the license (3-clause) is of concern, it can be changed to
>> whatever is preferred.
>
> That's great. Is it possible to switch to the 2-clause license as per
> https://www.netbsd.or
> Am 19.05.2018 um 13:25 schrieb Sevan Janiyan :
>
> On 19/05/2018 11:36, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>> The main page of the repository says it's incomplete.
>
> "This module does not aim to be complete, it merely contains functions
> that I needed at some point of time"
Aiming for completeness
t have any tentacles (a hand full of C files,
>> excluding headers), It's licensed under a 3 clause style BSD license and
>> written by mbalmer@.
>> I would like to import this into base as unix(3lua) and wanted to ask
>> for feedback, is there any reason not to?
>&
up from there.
If you have time and energy to write and maintain code, I'm all for it.
However, unix(3lua) will create a fragmentation: if you write code for
POSIX-compatible OS (e.g. Linux) you use luaposix unless you're on NetBSD,
in which case you should use unix(3lua).
> > Wouldn
Hi Marc,
On 17/05/2018 14:48, Marc Balmer wrote:
> If the license (3-clause) is of concern, it can be changed to
> whatever is preferred.
That's great. Is it possible to switch to the 2-clause license as per
https://www.netbsd.org/about/redistribution.html#default
Your call if you want to switch
On 19/05/2018 11:36, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> The main page of the repository says it's incomplete.
"This module does not aim to be complete, it merely contains functions
that I needed at some point of time"
> Does anyone plan to make it complete or near complete?
I was thinking along that lin
licensed under a 3 clause style BSD license and
> written by mbalmer@.
> I would like to import this into base as unix(3lua) and wanted to ask
> for feedback, is there any reason not to?
>
>
> Sevan
> [1] https://github.com/arcapos/luaunix
The main page of the repository say
> Am 18.05.2018 um 07:41 schrieb m...@netbsd.org:
>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:20:20AM +0100, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>> David Holland wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
One more thing: When we imported Lua into base, we very clearly
decided th
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:20:20AM +0100, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > > One more thing: When we imported Lua into base, we very clearly
> > > decided that pkgsrc Lua and base Lua should be two separate things
David Holland wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > One more thing: When we imported Lua into base, we very clearly
> > decided that pkgsrc Lua and base Lua should be two separate things.
> > Base Lua can not use pkgsrc Lua modules by default (and most
> > pr
> Am 17.05.2018 um 21:54 schrieb David Holland :
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> One more thing: When we imported Lua into base, we very clearly
>> decided that pkgsrc Lua and base Lua should be two separate things.
>> Base Lua can not use pkgsrc Lua modules b
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> One more thing: When we imported Lua into base, we very clearly
> decided that pkgsrc Lua and base Lua should be two separate things.
> Base Lua can not use pkgsrc Lua modules by default (and most
> probably vice versa).
...you ver
es,
> excluding headers), It's licensed under a 3 clause style BSD license and
> written by mbalmer@.
> I would like to import this into base as unix(3lua) and wanted to ask
> for feedback, is there any reason not to?
>
Keep in mind that we already have some NetBSD/Unix specif
It is meant to
> enhance the general Lua experience in NetBSD.
>
>
>
>> Am 17.05.2018 um 14:02 schrieb Martin Husemann :
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
>>> I would like to import this into base as unix(3lua) and w
This belongs into base because it works with base Lua. It is meant to enhance
the general Lua experience in NetBSD.
> Am 17.05.2018 um 14:02 schrieb Martin Husemann :
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
>> I would like to import this into base as
Oops, adding others in
> On 17 May 2018, at 13:15, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 17 May 2018, at 13:02, Martin Husemann wrote:
>>
>> Is there any reason to import it? Why not pkgsrc?
>
> Because the functionality is there in base already, it's just another
> representation of a small su
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
> I would like to import this into base as unix(3lua) and wanted to ask
> for feedback, is there any reason not to?
Is there any reason to import it? Why not pkgsrc?
Martin
written by mbalmer@.
I would like to import this into base as unix(3lua) and wanted to ask
for feedback, is there any reason not to?
Sevan
[1] https://github.com/arcapos/luaunix
19 matches
Mail list logo
