Date:Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:00:44 +0100
From:Joerg Sonnenberger
Message-ID: <20180307130044.gb24...@britannica.bec.de>
| This is a transformation typically done already.
I thought it might be with modern compilers - but it probably was not when
atan2() was originally
In article ,
Eitan Adler wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'd like to commit the patch below. Does anyone have concerns with it?
>
>Previous discussion:
>https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics/2018-February/thread.html
>https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=151859583112854&w=2
>
>Original submissio
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:56:21PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date:Wed, 7 Mar 2018 00:33:04 -0800
> From:Eitan Adler
> Message-ID:
>
>
>| I'd like to commit the patch below. Does anyone have concerns with it?
>
> The change looks fine technically, but it would
Date:Wed, 7 Mar 2018 00:33:04 -0800
From:Eitan Adler
Message-ID:
| I'd like to commit the patch below. Does anyone have concerns with it?
The change looks fine technically, but it would be good to see some benchmark
results before committing it - particularly fo
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:33:04AM -0800, Eitan Adler wrote:
> performed in a somewhat more complicated way than it need be. Change
> it to not be quite so cute, rather directly comparing the high/low
> bits of x to the specific IEEE-754 bit pattern that encodes 1.0.
Looks good to me.
Martin
Hi all,
I'd like to commit the patch below. Does anyone have concerns with it?
Previous discussion:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics/2018-February/thread.html
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=151859583112854&w=2
Original submission: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/pull/
