On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 18:21:05 +0100, Aymeric Vincent wrote:
> I plan to remove support for the apparently never documented former
> syntax and update the UEFI makefile's accordingly, unless someone
> remembers why it should remain and on which condition it should be
> enabled: the default should be
In article <877f4vl1fj@free.fr>,
Aymeric Vincent wrote:
>chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
>
>> I was trying to make it more symmetric with the other *ctl commands
>> without breaking existing usage:
>>
>> gpt [] device []
>
>Ah OK, I prefer that one, too. But isn't it too late n
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> I was trying to make it more symmetric with the other *ctl commands
> without breaking existing usage:
>
> gpt [] device []
Ah OK, I prefer that one, too. But isn't it too late now that several
releases included gpt with the other syntax?
Aymeric
In article <87fujjl3zy@free.fr>,
Aymeric Vincent wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>while trying to understand why gpt(8) didn't work under Linux, I
>discovered that it accepts two different usages:
>
>gpt
>and
>gpt
>
>The latter being the one documented in the manpage for ~ever. However,
>in the code,
Hi,
while trying to understand why gpt(8) didn't work under Linux, I
discovered that it accepts two different usages:
gpt
and
gpt
The latter being the one documented in the manpage for ~ever. However,
in the code, the decision to use it is conditioned by the name of the
program being ex
