> [...], putting the file only under root writability is a safety
> precaution too (against one's own blunders).
> There are pros and cons either way---meaning that, you are right, it
> has to be configurable; remains the question of: what should be the
> default? Strict or not?
Hmm. For NetBSD
Le Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 08:36:23AM -0400, Mouse a écrit :
> > There is one more thing I'd be inclined to add: when _serving_ a
> > config as root[*], error if the configuration (including sourced
> > chunks) is writable by someone else than root.
>
> > What do you think?
>
> A reasonable thing if
> There is one more thing I'd be inclined to add: when _serving_ a
> config as root[*], error if the configuration (including sourced
> chunks) is writable by someone else than root.
> What do you think?
A reasonable thing if it's an overridable default. An extremely
annoying thing (albeit only
I'm almost finished with inetd(8)---I still wait for an answer about ATF
tests: to be added if my version of inetd will reach the NetBSD src
tree; if not reaching the NetBSD src tree, I will not bother with ATF.
There is one more thing I'd be inclined to add: when
_serving_ a config as root[*], er
