On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:00:52AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> >For now though I've fixed it so -user and -group at least behave the
> >same way.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Your earlier comments about user names not being allowed to start with a
> plus or minus were informative. But what about grou
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, David Holland wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 05:19:54PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:10:27PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> > In my opinion, the -user and -group primaries should work strictly with
> > _names_, and _never_ fallback to {u,g}id valu
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 05:19:54PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:10:27PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> > In my opinion, the -user and -group primaries should work strictly with
> > _names_, and _never_ fallback to {u,g}id values; we could easily add
> > new primari
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:10:27PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> In my opinion, the -user and -group primaries should work strictly with
> _names_, and _never_ fallback to {u,g}id values; we could easily add
> new primaries -uid and -gid to search for the numeric values. However,
> this would
WRT to your (kre's) PR bin/46158, I have to wonder ...
Assume there is an entry in the password database for a username "123"
but with uid value of 456. If find is invoked with '-user 123' should
we match this pw entry and compare the file's numeric owner with 456?
Or should find(1) treat an all
