On 27.09.2017 07:38, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Apparently we do have our own version we do not install.
> https://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/include/tgmath.h
>
This version looks good. We could expand it with C11 fallback option for
the !GCC compiler and make it default for -std=c11.
I had in the past
Apparently we do have our own version we do not install.
https://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/include/tgmath.h
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:03:09PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 26.09.2017 22:33, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> Can we just import as-is the FreeBSD version? It has support for pre-C11
> >> compilers. This has header to b
On 26.09.2017 22:33, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> Can we just import as-is the FreeBSD version? It has support for pre-C11
>> compilers. This has header to be supported in the clean C99 mode.
>
> I see absolutely no reason for wan
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Can we just import as-is the FreeBSD version?
No.
> Can we please reuse the template license header for new code?
> Public-domain might be problematic for strict people (it does not work
> for all countries).
Absolutely not.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Can we just import as-is the FreeBSD version? It has support for pre-C11
> compilers. This has header to be supported in the clean C99 mode.
I see absolutely no reason for wanting to support tgmath.h in pre-C11
mode and a lot of v
On 26.09.2017 21:49, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> warning, if you like C for its simplicity, do not read the below post.
>
> while looking at the stdatomic nonsense versions, I noticed we are using
> tgmath.h from gcc, but no tgmath.h from clang, if the set lists are to
> believed.
>
> r
