In article <20161124112807.ga23...@britannica.bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:20:56AM +0100, Carsten Kunze wrote:
>> chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
>>
>> > I used this as the Makefile, and I can't reproduce it (current/amd64)
>> >
>> > $ cat Makefile
In article
<500665017.73024.1479975656251.javamail.ngm...@webmail12.arcor-online.net>,
Carsten Kunze wrote:
>chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
>
>> I used this as the Makefile, and I can't reproduce it (current/amd64)
>>
>> $ cat Makefile
>> LDFLAGS=-lcurses
>> CFLAGS=-g -fsanitize=
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:20:56AM +0100, Carsten Kunze wrote:
> chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
>
> > I used this as the Makefile, and I can't reproduce it (current/amd64)
> >
> > $ cat Makefile
> > LDFLAGS=-lcurses
> > CFLAGS=-g -fsanitize=address
> >
> > all: main
> >
> > clean
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
> I used this as the Makefile, and I can't reproduce it (current/amd64)
>
> $ cat Makefile
> LDFLAGS=-lcurses
> CFLAGS=-g -fsanitize=address
>
> all: main
>
> clean:
> rm -f main
Only for a short time I could use ASAN, now it crashes again,
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
>
> I used this as the Makefile, and I can't reproduce it (current/amd64)
>
> $ cat Makefile
> LDFLAGS=-lcurses
> CFLAGS=-g -fsanitize=address
>
> all: main
>
> clean:
> rm -f main
This works indeed. And now also my Makefile and also the w
In article
<1507925951.56433.1479909932210.javamail.ngm...@webmail12.arcor-online.net>,
Carsten Kunze wrote:
>Brett Lymn wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:46:50PM +0100, Carsten Kunze wrote:
>> >
>> > I want to do further tests with new hints I got from Brett. If it doesn't
>> work I'll
There was a typo in my last mail--I meant ncursesw has significant problems
with wide chars. IIRC it did work in the past with printw, addstr, etc., but
now I use add_wchstr(). There are no problems on other UNIX systems and there
is no problem with NetBSD curses. But this is OT to this list,
Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:46:50PM +0100, Carsten Kunze wrote:
> >
> > I want to do further tests with new hints I got from Brett. If it doesn't
> work I'll try again to prepare a minimum example from scratch.
> >
>
> Just for the record, what I suggested was try a touchwi
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:46:50PM +0100, Carsten Kunze wrote:
>
> I want to do further tests with new hints I got from Brett. If it doesn't
> work I'll try again to prepare a minimum example from scratch.
>
Just for the record, what I suggested was try a touchwin() or touch on
the subwin line
Julian Coleman wrote:
> Can you try the attached patch and see if that makes things work for you?
I didn't note the patch. I'll try that of course, thank you!
Hi Julian,
indeed it does work for simple examples. I had an off-list discussion
regarding this thread with Brett Lymm. He asked me to prepare a minimum
example which shows the issue. I was not able to produce it, i.e. the minimum
example did work. In the real application where it fails it
Hi,
> while wmove(stdscr, ...) seems to work fine, wmove(, ...)
> doesn't move the physical cursor, even if the other window has the same
> position and size as stdscr. Tested with NetBSD 7.99.39
> (GENERIC.201609300910Z) amd64. Is this a known problem? (The problem does
> not occur with nc
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 08:44:52PM +0200, Carsten Kunze wrote:
>
> while wmove(stdscr, ...) seems to work fine, wmove(, ...)
> doesn't move the physical cursor, even if the other window has the same
> position and size as stdscr. Tested with NetBSD 7.99.39
> (GENERIC.201609300910Z) amd64. Is
13 matches
Mail list logo
